Please note: We are aware of an issue affecting replies on the Arm Community forums, which may not be loading as expected.
We apologize for any inconvenience and appreciate your patience while we investigate and work to resolve the issue.
Thank you for your understanding.
The Arm Cortex-R Comparison Table downloaded from Arm (https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=2ahUKEwibler1ifX5AhWOXvEDHY-QAwkQFnoECBIQAQ&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.arm.com%2F-%2Fmedia%2FArm%2520Developer%2520Community%2FPDF%2FCortex-A%2520R%2520M%2520datasheets%2FArm%2520Cortex-R%2520Comparison%2520Table.pdf&usg=AOvVaw116KiFKxN8hBF9IU4S1Bgv) implies it does, but I have heard information contrary to this elsewhere.
Looking to understand the differences between the Cortex-R52+ and R52 and this MP support (coherency) seems to be one of a few along with support for virtualization extensions, etc.
So, is the R52+ cache coherent or not?
R52+ is the same as R52, it doesn't support the cache coherency across cores within the same cluster.The description of R52+ is not correct, it should be "Up to UP4, No coherency".
Does the Cortex-R52+ support EL2 / virtualization extensions? This is mentioned on the Arm product page linked by in the above referenced PDF, but I am curious how a non-coherent UP environment will support a hypervisor or virtual machines.
Is this the only difference between the R-52 and R-52+ (virtualization extensions)?
Both CR52 and CR52+ support virtualization.developer.arm.com/.../virtualization-support