We are running a survey to help us improve the experience for all of our members. If you see the survey appear, please take the time to tell us about your experience if you can.
The Arm Cortex-R Comparison Table downloaded from Arm (https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=2ahUKEwibler1ifX5AhWOXvEDHY-QAwkQFnoECBIQAQ&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.arm.com%2F-%2Fmedia%2FArm%2520Developer%2520Community%2FPDF%2FCortex-A%2520R%2520M%2520datasheets%2FArm%2520Cortex-R%2520Comparison%2520Table.pdf&usg=AOvVaw116KiFKxN8hBF9IU4S1Bgv) implies it does, but I have heard information contrary to this elsewhere.
Looking to understand the differences between the Cortex-R52+ and R52 and this MP support (coherency) seems to be one of a few along with support for virtualization extensions, etc.
So, is the R52+ cache coherent or not?
Does the Cortex-R52+ support EL2 / virtualization extensions? This is mentioned on the Arm product page linked by in the above referenced PDF, but I am curious how a non-coherent UP environment will support a hypervisor or virtual machines.
Is this the only difference between the R-52 and R-52+ (virtualization extensions)?
Both CR52 and CR52+ support virtualization.developer.arm.com/.../virtualization-support