I just would like if there's any easy way to integrate a PIC on the Keil Board, the aim would be to input the program through an external PIC programmator and to send a simple instruction to the PIC through KEil board and to recover a signal from the PIC at the end of the program. Once this would work, I would like to change the PIC program through the Keil ULINK2. IS it possible and HOW Thanks
Connect your PIC using the UART. Then your ARM can send commands and data to the PIC and pick up any results. An SPI channel is also excellent for connecting two processors. A SPI solution will allow direct logic-level connections, while the Keil board probably doesn't allow you to make use of the logic-level USART signals.
By the way: It is always best to try to explain what problem you want to solve instead of jumping in directly with a specific technical question. We don't know if you are helped by a specific answer or if the "real" answer should be something else if we don't know the "story behind".
To be honest with you I'm not familiar to Forum use and with electronics. I re-define you thus my request: We need for a prototype in a small budget to control several triggers between camera, lighting, printing head, 2 motors. The easiest way chosen by one student in electronics last year was based on PIC 16F84 solution to be in relation with µsec triggering. That already works on a basic electronic board. We need now to change the delay between different triggers during our process, it's the reason why we bought a KEil ARM and a U LINK 2 to be able to connect the PIC and others on the board and change the program directly by the PC through the Ulink. Note that I'm a chemist in prinitng technologies and thus please I do like prefer to get the easiest explanation about that.
If you need to transmit parameters, it is easiest to connect a large number of PIC chips with SPI. If you need to send new programs to the PIC chips, you have to check with someone who are more familiar with them if they ave a good method for in-system-programming or in-application-programming.
I guess if an electronics engineer came along and started asking detailed chemistry questions, you'd suggest that he gets a chemist to do it?
Thus you'd probably be better off to just specify your requirements, and get someone "skilled in the Art" do worry about the actual implementation?
http://www.keil.com/condb
Either that, or you're going to have to commit some serious time to learning embedded microcontroller development...