Arm Community
Site
Search
User
Site
Search
User
Groups
Education Hub
Distinguished Ambassadors
Open Source Software and Platforms
Research Collaboration and Enablement
Forums
AI and ML forum
Architectures and Processors forum
Arm Development Platforms forum
Arm Development Studio forum
Arm Virtual Hardware forum
Automotive forum
Compilers and Libraries forum
Graphics, Gaming, and VR forum
High Performance Computing (HPC) forum
Infrastructure Solutions forum
Internet of Things (IoT) forum
Keil forum
Morello forum
Operating Systems forum
SoC Design and Simulation forum
SystemReady Forum
Blogs
AI and ML blog
Announcements
Architectures and Processors blog
Automotive blog
Graphics, Gaming, and VR blog
High Performance Computing (HPC) blog
Infrastructure Solutions blog
Internet of Things (IoT) blog
Operating Systems blog
SoC Design and Simulation blog
Tools, Software and IDEs blog
Support
Arm Support Services
Documentation
Downloads
Training
Arm Approved program
Arm Design Reviews
Community Help
More
Cancel
Support forums
Graphics, Gaming, and VR forum
Mail T604 and T624 Difference
Jump...
Cancel
Locked
Locked
Replies
2 replies
Subscribers
136 subscribers
Views
3949 views
Users
0 members are here
Midgard
Mali-T624
OpenGL ES
Mali-T604
OpenGL
Adaptive Scalable Texture Compression (ASTC)
Mali-GPU
Options
Share
More actions
Cancel
Related
How was your experience today?
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion
Mail T604 and T624 Difference
Jay Walsh
over 11 years ago
Note: This was originally posted on 1st March 2013 at
http://forums.arm.com
Hi! I'm not used in GPU. I am looking for 2d and 3d graphic multicore solution and I found Mail T604 and T624. The two mail are said to have graphic solution.
Yet, I'm puzzled by the description of the two mail. I have only one core. What is the difference of T604 and T624 if they are both scalable multi core solution for 2d and 3d graphic?
Parents
Peter Harris
over 11 years ago
Note: This was originally posted on 1st March 2013 at
http://forums.arm.com
Both are "Midgard" architecture GPU, so provide almost (*) the same functionality to the graphics API. Mali-T62x is a second generation Midgard core, so provides higher performance and energy efficiency at the same frequency vs Mali-T604.
(*) The main API-level feature change is the addition of support for the new ASTC texture compression format(**), which was designed by ARM and adopted by Khronos as an official extension for OpenGL ES and OpenGL.
(**)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adaptive_Scalable_Texture_Compression
Cancel
Up
0
Down
Cancel
Reply
Peter Harris
over 11 years ago
Note: This was originally posted on 1st March 2013 at
http://forums.arm.com
Both are "Midgard" architecture GPU, so provide almost (*) the same functionality to the graphics API. Mali-T62x is a second generation Midgard core, so provides higher performance and energy efficiency at the same frequency vs Mali-T604.
(*) The main API-level feature change is the addition of support for the new ASTC texture compression format(**), which was designed by ARM and adopted by Khronos as an official extension for OpenGL ES and OpenGL.
(**)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adaptive_Scalable_Texture_Compression
Cancel
Up
0
Down
Cancel
Children
No data