Support forums

Graphics, Gaming, and VR forum Mail T604 and T624 Difference

Locked Locked
Replies 2 replies
Subscribers 136 subscribers
Views 3948 views
Users 0 members are here

Options

How was your experience today?

This discussion has been locked.

You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Mail T604 and T624 Difference

Jay Walsh over 11 years ago

Note: This was originally posted on 1st March 2013 at http://forums.arm.com

Hi! I'm not used in GPU. I am looking for 2d and 3d graphic multicore solution and I found Mail T604 and T624. The two mail are said to have graphic solution.
Yet, I'm puzzled by the description of the two mail. I have only one core. What is the difference of T604 and T624 if they are both scalable multi core solution for 2d and 3d graphic?

Peter Harris over 11 years ago

Note: This was originally posted on 1st March 2013 at http://forums.arm.com

Both are "Midgard" architecture GPU, so provide almost (*) the same functionality to the graphics API. Mali-T62x is a second generation Midgard core, so provides higher performance and energy efficiency at the same frequency vs Mali-T604.

(*) The main API-level feature change is the addition of support for the new ASTC texture compression format(**), which was designed by ARM and adopted by Khronos as an official extension for OpenGL ES and OpenGL.

(**) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adaptive_Scalable_Texture_Compression
Cancel
Up 0 Down

Cancel
Alban Rampon over 11 years ago

Note: This was originally posted on 1st March 2013 at http://forums.arm.com

Hi guys, I'm just moving that thread to the Mali graphics board.
Cheers,
Alban
Cancel
Up 0 Down

Cancel