• State Not Answered
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 8 replies
  • Subscribers 351 subscribers
  • Views 12517 views
  • Users 0 members are here
2025 survey

We are running a survey to help us improve the experience for all of our members. If you see the survey appear, please take the time to tell us about your experience if you can.

Options
Related
How was your experience today?
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Early Burst Termination with IDLE transfer in Multi-Layer AHB Lite

Guy H

Hi,

We are designing an Asynch slave operating over Multi Layer AHB Lite 3.0.

I have come across some case which I am not sure how it should be handled.

I am getting a predefined burst INCR16 , and the following occurs : 

Cycle     :          1          |       2      |       3      |        4     |       5      |  ...

HBURST:   INCR16      | INCR16 | NA         | INCR16 | INCR16  |  ...

HSELS  :          1          |       1       |       0     |        1     |        1      | ...

HTRANS:    NONSEQ |     SEQ    |    IDLE  |     SEQ  |      SEQ   | ...

Actually, I get early burst termination using IDLE transfer in cycle #3, however, I am not sure whether this is a legal state to return to sequential transfer with predefined burst after that, or should the master re-start with nonseq transfer of undefined length ? 

What is the expected behavior a slave would see in case in early termination with IDLE Transfer ? 

Thanks,

Guy

Parents Reply Children
No data