We are running a survey to help us improve the experience for all of our members. If you see the survey appear, please take the time to tell us about your experience if you can.
I was reading up on the flash eeprom and best I can tell for the stm32f chips this is needed. micromouseusa.com/
Has Keil mdk5 not provided a simple function?
I would avoid the EEPROM Emulation completely if all you want to do is save a configuration structure.
Pick one (or two) of the early 16KB sectors (@ 0x08004000, 0x08008000 or 0x0800C000), and then journal the writing of your structure across this space, selecting the last one written, and writing the new/changed one beyond the current.
Reading, it's in the address space, so create a structure pointer to the base of the sector and index into them. Have the first word of your structure be a signature, ie not 0xFFFFFFFF and the last word a CRC or checksum to prove/confirm validity.
Simplified method,
typedef struct _CONFIG { uint32_t Signature; // 0x12345678 ? // .. other neat stuff uint32_t Checksum; } CONFIG; CONFIG *config = (CONFIG *)0x08004000; // Config FLASH Sector Base CONFIG curr; const CONFIG default = { 0 }; // Add int i; i = 0; while(config[i+1].Signature != 0xFFFFFFFF) // Index to last i++; if (config[i].Signature == 0xFFFFFFFF) // Empty case { puts("Config Empty, using defaults"); memcpy(&curr, &default, sizeof(CONFIG)); } else { // Check signature and checksum puts("Loading Config"); memcpy(&curr, &config[i], sizeof(CONFIG)); // .. } // ... // Writing next block if (config[i].Signature != 0xFFFFFFFF) // Advance to blank i++; curr.Signature = 0x12345678; // Checksum new configuration, then write to FLASH curr.Checksum = CRC32(0xFFFFFFFF, &curr, sizeof(CONFIG) - 4); FLASH_WriteBlock((uint32_t)&config[i], &curr, sizeof(CONFIG)); // Addr, Buffer, Size
That's not really "avoiding EEPROM emulation completely". That is, for all practical intents and purposes, EEPROM emulation (although a somewhat coarse one).
It does avoid pretending it is EEPROM and treats it like FLASH, so it does dispense with a rather thick abstraction from ST with an Adddress/Byte storage system that immediately reduces the available space by at least a quarter.
The problem with pretending is that you keep doing things which are inappropriate rather than change the paradigm to a more appropriate one. ie a FLASH within the MPU address space, vs a I2C EEPROM
Where is FLASH_writeBlock ?
I could not find an include to support this function. I tried a few other write methods.
1. Example from eeprom emulation reads but does not write. 2. STM32F2 Standard Peripheral bibliotheek same.
example
if(HAL_FLASH_Unlock()!=HAL_OK) //return ok. FLASH_PageErase(0x0800c000); FLASH->CR = 0;//known bug that apparent is not documented.
if(HAL_FLASH_Program(FLASH_TYPEPROGRAM_WORD, 0x0800c000, 0x01010101) != HAL_OK) //error
HAL_FLASH_Lock();
I wrote the pseudo code off the top of my head in minutes.
FLASH_WriteBlock() is an abstraction for the code that manages the processor interaction with flash, figure it is a Flash aware memcpy()