Arm Community
Site
Search
User
Site
Search
User
Groups
Research Collaboration and Enablement
DesignStart
Education Hub
Innovation
Open Source Software and Platforms
Forums
AI and ML forum
Architectures and Processors forum
Arm Development Platforms forum
Arm Development Studio forum
Arm Virtual Hardware forum
Automotive forum
Compilers and Libraries forum
Graphics, Gaming, and VR forum
High Performance Computing (HPC) forum
Infrastructure Solutions forum
Internet of Things (IoT) forum
Keil forum
Morello Forum
Operating Systems forum
SoC Design and Simulation forum
中文社区论区
Blogs
AI and ML blog
Announcements
Architectures and Processors blog
Automotive blog
Graphics, Gaming, and VR blog
High Performance Computing (HPC) blog
Infrastructure Solutions blog
Innovation blog
Internet of Things (IoT) blog
Operating Systems blog
Research Articles
SoC Design and Simulation blog
Tools, Software and IDEs blog
中文社区博客
Support
Arm Support Services
Documentation
Downloads
Training
Arm Approved program
Arm Design Reviews
Community Help
More
Cancel
Support forums
Arm Development Studio forum
Looking for a way to not place any static data in BSS section
Jump...
Cancel
Locked
Locked
Replies
3 replies
Subscribers
121 subscribers
Views
4176 views
Users
0 members are here
Options
Share
More actions
Cancel
Related
How was your experience today?
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion
Looking for a way to not place any static data in BSS section
Offline
Adam Openshaw
over 9 years ago
Note: This was originally posted on 2nd October 2012 at
http://forums.arm.com
The ARM compiler is very strict (and formidable) at placing zero initialized or uninitialized static data > 8 bytes into the BSS section to save space in the image. I have a use case where I do not want ANY static data in BSS. I want all of it to go into RO/RW-DATA sections only.
I've scoured the web looking for something similar or equivalent to the GNU C compiler's -fno-zero-initialized-in-bss option for RVCT, but cannot find anything. I'm compiling with DS-5.
Does anyone know if there is a way to compile without placing any static data into the BSS section? Placing static data into a BSS section is an optimization, and it's only natural that you should be able to disable it.
Thanks,
Meiyo
Parents
Offline
Adam Openshaw
over 9 years ago
Note: This was originally posted on 3rd October 2012 at
http://forums.arm.com
I was able to accomplish what I desired after consulting ARM support. For anyone who is interested, here is the solution:
The answer is using the --bss_threshold option when compiling. The documentation on this option makes it seem like the only two options are: --bss_threshold=0 or --bss_threshold=8...
[font=Verdana, Tahoma, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif][size=2]
Syntax
[/size][/font][font=Verdana, Tahoma, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif][size=2]--bss_threshold=
num
Where:
num
is either:
0place small global ZI data items in ZI data sections
8place small global ZI data items in RW data sections.
[/size][/font]
It turns out, however, that the compiler is actually capable of accepting anything up to the maximum int, and anything below that size in bytes will be put into RW data instead of BSS.
Regards,
Meiyo
Cancel
Up
0
Down
Cancel
Reply
Offline
Adam Openshaw
over 9 years ago
Note: This was originally posted on 3rd October 2012 at
http://forums.arm.com
I was able to accomplish what I desired after consulting ARM support. For anyone who is interested, here is the solution:
The answer is using the --bss_threshold option when compiling. The documentation on this option makes it seem like the only two options are: --bss_threshold=0 or --bss_threshold=8...
[font=Verdana, Tahoma, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif][size=2]
Syntax
[/size][/font][font=Verdana, Tahoma, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif][size=2]--bss_threshold=
num
Where:
num
is either:
0place small global ZI data items in ZI data sections
8place small global ZI data items in RW data sections.
[/size][/font]
It turns out, however, that the compiler is actually capable of accepting anything up to the maximum int, and anything below that size in bytes will be put into RW data instead of BSS.
Regards,
Meiyo
Cancel
Up
0
Down
Cancel
Children
No data