Deploying quantized Tensorflow lite model using zynq-library on Zynq-7000

Hi,

I tried to use ArmNN as you said and when testing ArmNN quantized Mobilenet in the step of building the mobilenetv1_quant_tflite program I get this error

arm-linux-gnueabihf-g++: error: -E or -x required when input is from standard input
arm-linux-gnueabihf-g++: error: -E or -x required when input is from standard input
Makefile:14: recipe for target 'mobilenetv1_quant_tflite' failed
make: *** [mobilenetv1_quant_tflite] Error 1

Any suggestions please??

Hi,

I tried to use ArmNN as you said and when testing ArmNN quantized Mobilenet in the step of building the mobilenetv1_quant_tflite program I get this error

arm-linux-gnueabihf-g++: error: -E or -x required when input is from standard input
arm-linux-gnueabihf-g++: error: -E or -x required when input is from standard input
Makefile:14: recipe for target 'mobilenetv1_quant_tflite' failed
make: *** [mobilenetv1_quant_tflite] Error 1

Any suggestions please??

That looks like a bug in your command line.  That's a standard gcc / clang error, likely an incorrect flag, or misplaced '-'

This is the makefile. Actually I checked and I couldn't find the incorrect flag

ARMNN_ROOT = /home/lsa/armnn-pi/armnn
ARMNN_BUILD = /home/lsa/armnn-pi/armnn/build
BOOST_ROOT = /home/lsa/armnn-pi/boost
CXX= arm-linux-gnueabihf-g++
CPPFLAGS=-DARMNN_TF_LITE_PARSER -I$(ARMNN_ROOT)/include -I$(ARMNN_ROOT)/src/backends -I$(ARMNN_ROOT)/src/armnnUtils -I$(ARMNN_ROOT)/tests -I$(BOOST_ROOT)/include
CFLAGS=-Wall -O3 -std=c++14 -fPIE

LDFLAGS=-pie -L$(ARMNN_BUILD) -L$(ARMNN_BUILD)/tests -L$(BOOST_ROOT)/lib
LDLIBS=-larmnn -larmnnTfLiteParser -lboost_system -lboost_filesystem -lboost_program_options

all: mobilenetv1_quant_tflite

mobilenetv1_quant_tflite: mobilenetv1_quant_tflite.cpp inference_test_image.cpp utils.cpp
$(CXX) $(CPPFLAGS) $(CFLAGS) $^ -o $@ $(LDFLAGS) $(LDLIBS)

clean:
-rm -f mobilenetv1_quant_tflite

It's likely to be the command line rather than the Makefile.  What have you got there?

I just wrote make

Ah, so it's not that then! :)

I also can't see what's weird in the makefile, but others are more expert at make than me, so someone else might pick up something that's missing or whatever.

Ok thank you for your Help !