• State Accepted Answer
  • Replies 2 replies
  • Subscribers 18 subscribers
  • Views 512 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
Related
How was your experience today?

Sending massive packets to a closed UDP client

Volter_1122

Hi,

In my program, I established a full-duplex TCP communication with my PC via a router.

				 Socket.SCK = netTCP_GetSocket (tcp_cb_func);
						if (Socket.SCK >= 0) 
						{
							netTCP_Listen (Socket.SCK , 5150);
							netTCP_SetOption (Socket.SCK , netTCP_OptionTimeout, 5)
						}

The connection was functioning correctly. However, when a new client was added to the network switch and sent a 1K multicast packet to all connected devices, an unexpected issue arose. Although my program did not open any UDP sockets, the UDP event handler was an empty block, my program stopped working after some hours.  Should I do anything else that I wasn't aware of?

uint32_t udp_cb_func (int32_t socket, const  NET_ADDR *addr, const uint8_t *buf, uint32_t len) {
	return 0;
}

Parents
  • +1

    Hello,

    Based on the observed reaction of the circuit, when it receives more data (even if the correct socket is not configured to receive them), the load on the network functions increases. This implies that within the Real-Time Operating System (RTOS) structure, more time is required for the network functions to operate well. By introducing longer sleep periods (osDelay) for other functions, the network function can work correctly.

Reply
  • +1

    Hello,

    Based on the observed reaction of the circuit, when it receives more data (even if the correct socket is not configured to receive them), the load on the network functions increases. This implies that within the Real-Time Operating System (RTOS) structure, more time is required for the network functions to operate well. By introducing longer sleep periods (osDelay) for other functions, the network function can work correctly.

Children