Hello all,
This is my first time posting on a forum, so all feedbacks are welcome in order to improve !
I'll begin with the context information, followed by the issue encountered, and at the end, you'll find all the setup information (e.g. compiler version, and so on).
The context is as follows :
We have several applications that we want to support with different compilers : Clang (Keil), GCC, and IAR.
We also have two libraries that we offer in black box form and with an API defined in our headers so that people using our applications only focus on the application itself and not what's behind the scenes. To achieve this, we built the libraries with Keil and following the AEABI recommendations (Misc Controls added in the Linker panel : --library_interface=aeabi_clib).
Functionally speaking, it is working fine on the 3 compilers when we use the Keil libs into our applications.
The issue I'm facing is how to debug such libs.
When the application is a Keil project, so the app is Keil, and libs are Keil, the debugging experience is excellent, even with optimizations enabled. The call stack is 100% consistent, no address jumps or offsets are introduced, all function calls are perfectly followed.
However, when the application is let's say an IAR one, so the app is built with IAR, and the libs are still made with Keil, it sometimes happens that an offset is introduced, leading to some function calls not being tracable, like let's say this case :
At first, I thought it was coming from optimizations, but after removing them during investigations and regarding how the debugging experience for a 100% Keil case was with them enabled, I arrived at the conclusion that it might come from a debug information mismatch between Keil generated debug information and how the IAR debugger interprets them.
However, I also found on this github : https://github.com/ARM-software/abi-aa/blob/main/aadwarf32/aadwarf32.rst#overview that "The ABI for the Arm architecture specifies the use of DWARF 3.0-format debugging data". According to the standard itself, https://dwarfstd.org/dwarf4std.html, gdwarf 3.0 and 4.0 are compatible.
Anyway, I've also tried setting gdwarf 3.0 as the debug format for Keil libs by adding this into the Compiler Misc Control panel (and by removing the use of 'Debug Information" in the Output panel) : -g -g3 -gdwarf-3 -gstrict-dwarf
But it didn't work either way.
Does anyone know what's going on behind the scenes and how to fix this if it happens to any of you please ? I'm running out of ideas for debugging Keil libraries on IAR.
If the debug information mismatch isn't the subject to investigate, what advice and investigations tips can you give me please ?
Setup information :
Thank you for your help to understand what's happening ! I wish you a great day,
Max
This thread also passed through my eyes and sadly I don't have a good answer to give you, but I spotted your reference to the ABI seemingly requiring DWARF-3. I believe that in practice DWARF-4 is widely used these days and is well supported by AC6, so you may be better off sticking to DWARF-4 across all tools.I raised https://github.com/ARM-software/abi-aa/issues/239 for this to be tracked on the ABI side -- maybe the answer will be that the wording should be updated to "require a minimum of DWARF-3".
Hello Stam,
I agree with Dwarf-4 being widely supported, hence the reason I first enabled the debug information through the debug panel rather than specifying it explicitly on the command line. I gave a shot to both formats, unfortunately the underlying issue remained.
Thank you for opening case 239, that'd clarify this point as you mentioned.