This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Porting a IAR Project to Keil (stm32 + freertos)

Hi,

so I uploaded a Project from STMicroelectronics. It is the IAR Project of the iNEMO Sensor Eval-Board from STmicro.

sourceforge.net/.../download

I failed a plenty times to converting it to KEIL.
(missing header files - but I surely added every folder into the includes in the settings and some points more)

If there is somebody who could help me it would be perfect.

In the uploaded file there is also my Keil Project in the EWARM-Project folder.

I have to setup a ROM offset (rom is starting at 0x8003000, because there is a ST DFU bootloader for firmware upgrade applications) in IAR the offset was done by a .icf file.

- i copied the startup file from the KEIL directory and replaced it with the IAR one.
(backup also in folder)

anyway take a look into the zip archive please.

It works perfectly in IAR.

- why am I need the project in keil? Because we want to switch from the lite version of IAR to the Keil prof. and we want to debug some code with the keil compiler.

I have a ST-Link and a KEIL uLINK2 and a ULINK PRO debugger.

Please help.

I found a application note for this topic but its seems not to be for free :(
url: www.cmc.ca/.../CMC-00200-01917.aspx

with regards
Sam

Parents
  • "Anyway I contacted ST to get a clear answer and maybe a permission to share my project wich bases on the ST Lib and Code Example's provided with my eval-board in technical forums.
    So I hope they give me a quick answer."

    And that is the correct route to go.
    Step 1 - check what licenses apply.
    Step 2 (if needed) - make explicit questions/requests to the license holder.

    Note that the ST forum moderators aren't employed by the legal department. Their task would probably be described as "helpful with a low profile".

    The interesting thing is that companies often have interesting licenses. Like the manufacturer of a USB thumb memory who had a license forbidding use on multiple computers. I obviously can't connect it to multiple computers concurrently, since it basically forms its own hardware lock. And on the other hand, it's explicitly sold (explicitly mentioned in their marketing material) for transfer of data between computers, so they can't mean that it must be permanently locked down to a single computer.

    When companies publish dumb licenses, we can increase their costs by writing them and ask specific questions about the licenses. Sometimes they do realize that it might be better to modify the license.

Reply
  • "Anyway I contacted ST to get a clear answer and maybe a permission to share my project wich bases on the ST Lib and Code Example's provided with my eval-board in technical forums.
    So I hope they give me a quick answer."

    And that is the correct route to go.
    Step 1 - check what licenses apply.
    Step 2 (if needed) - make explicit questions/requests to the license holder.

    Note that the ST forum moderators aren't employed by the legal department. Their task would probably be described as "helpful with a low profile".

    The interesting thing is that companies often have interesting licenses. Like the manufacturer of a USB thumb memory who had a license forbidding use on multiple computers. I obviously can't connect it to multiple computers concurrently, since it basically forms its own hardware lock. And on the other hand, it's explicitly sold (explicitly mentioned in their marketing material) for transfer of data between computers, so they can't mean that it must be permanently locked down to a single computer.

    When companies publish dumb licenses, we can increase their costs by writing them and ask specific questions about the licenses. Sometimes they do realize that it might be better to modify the license.

Children