Hi
When I test Cortex-R52 with GIC500 (GICv3), I find an issue.
The interrupt is handled by the following order:
1. save context
2. read ICC_IAR0, get INTID
3. jump to ISR of the associated INTID
4. write ICC_EOIR0
5. restore context
The IRQ is unmasked before writing ICC_EOIR0.
When an IRQ is triggered frequently, I find the CPU will never goes to the last step - restore context. Could you explain the reason for that ?
BR, Grace
Hi Martin
Another question about IRQ and FIQ of GICv3:
if in the FIQ ISR, the IRQ is unmasked and an IRQ comes, will CPU service the IRQ first before writing ICC_EOIR0 to complete the FIQ service ?
Generally - yes. If the IRQ input is asserted and IRQs are unmasked (CPSR.I=0) then I'd expect the core to take the exception. That you're currently handling an FIQ (G0) interrupt doesn't really matter.
Per tests, I agree with you.
Besides, I have some other questions from tests.
What I do is as follows:
1. configure and enable a FIQ with priority 0 and an IRQ with priority 10.
2. at the end of FIQ callback enable FIQ and IRQ (CPSR.I and F = 0)
3. for some particular timing, before writing ICC_EOIR0, the IRQ asserts and the CPU goes to irq exception but the returned INTID is 1023.
From the CPU interface registers: ICC_RPR is 0 that is the FIQ, and ICC_HPPIR1 is the IRQ ID. I think in this case, while entering irq exception, the CPU interface finds the HPPI IRQ has not sufficient priority as its priority 10 is lower than the active FIQ priority 0. So the special INTID 1023 (IRQ) is returned.
And if FIQ has lower priority 10 and IRQ has higher priority 0, the similar situation will also happen, that is FIQ INTID1023 is returned.
Is my understanding right ?
Thanks and regards.
Grace