We are running a survey to help us improve the experience for all of our members. If you see the survey appear, please take the time to tell us about your experience if you can.
hi i work on n version programming over the controller area network and need at least 4 can transceiver for implementing that(1 for voter, 3 for sending the data) because i am going to simulate the function, i should have access to every 4 transceiver at the same time. can any one say me how i can do that? and which micro controller(s) must be used?
because i am going to simulate the function, i should have access to every 4 transceiver at the same time. can any one say me how i can do that? and which micro controller(s) must be used? I can not tell you "which micro controller(s) must be used", but if you use the SILabs f04x chips, you can run 4 JTAG debug dongles at the same time. YES, I know I am talking about emulation, not simualation.
Erik
If you are just Simulating, then you don't need any microcontrollers at all! That is the whole point of simulation!
I think you need to explain more clearly what you are actually trying to achieve!
If you're searching for microcontrollers, go to http://www.keil.com/dd/search_parm.asp
to Mr. malund can u give me a sample code in keil format including your controller suggestion(si lab)? to Mr.Neil yes i should correct my title i just want a method for handling 4 can micro controller at the same time in simulation mode
The simulator simulates only 1 controller - but you can run multiple instances of the simulator..
to Mr. malund can u give me a sample code in keil format including your controller suggestion(si lab)? I am 6'4" (191cm) tall why do you call me micro (u)?
SILabs (Silicon Laboratories) is a chip manufacturer. Buy 4 devboards.
Buy 4 devboards. the f04x devkit comes with 2 boards and one adapter, so the recommendation, more explicitly, should be buy 2 devkits and 2 adapters and you will be able to debug 4 nodes concurrently.
Not having tried it, does that mean you have to run 4 "instances" of uVision?
If so, would you suggest any "minimum system spec(s)" for doing it?
Just curious, like...
Not having tried it, does that mean you have to run 4 "instances" of uVision? maybe, if you insist
I do, due to its shortcomings not run uVision, but instead run .bat makefiles.
I have run up to 7 instances of the SILabs (ICE like) debugger (accessible only through the SILabs 'IDE').
Do you run them all on the same PC? If so, does that mean it needs to be a "high-spec" PC?
Or do you just use 7 PCs?
Or something in between?
Do you run them all on the same PC? One PC will do very well. I admit that it can be an advantage to use multiple monitors (on one PC) to observe which reached a breakpoint f1rst, that,however is convenience, not requirement.
If so, does that mean it needs to be a "high-spec" PC? I do not know if Microsoft has got it fixed, but there were some real problems with USB expanders running this reliably. I have extra USB ports installed.
I, actually, was totally flabbergasted when I found that the SILabs programmers (who did not invent the hot water) had made this possible.