• State Not Answered
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 14 replies
  • Subscribers 22 subscribers
  • Views 2628 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
Related
How was your experience today?
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Porting FlashFS to use NANDFlash

Stefan Hartwig

Hi,
I adopted FlashFS to use my NANDFlash (9F2G08U0A).
finit() and fformat ("F:") are working fine and the flash gets erased.
But if I call fopen, to create files, I get linker error:

.\at91sam9260-sdram\at91sam9260-sdram.axf: Error: L6915E: Library reports error: __use_no_semihosting_swi was requested, but _sys_open was referenced


I got a retarget.c which implements _sys_open and many other _sys-functions:

FILEHANDLE _sys_open (const char *name, int openmode) {
   /* Register standard Input Output devices. */
   if (strcmp(name, "STDIN") == 0) {
      return (STDIN);
   }
   if (strcmp(name, "STDOUT") == 0) {
      return (STDOUT);
   }
   if (strcmp(name, "STDERR") == 0) {
      return (STDERR);
   }
   return (__fopen (name, openmode));
}

How can I compile my code without errors?

Parents
  • 0 in reply to Tamir Michael

    Tamir,

    I would go with MCI + SDCard. It has the best performance/price ratio.
    I'm using the SDcard only for internal use replacing a NAND flash.

    Advantages:
    *MCI in 4 bits mode has the fastest speed.
    *The FS is FAT16/32, so you can read/write the info with a PC.
    *Easy to upgrade with more memory if is necessary.
    *SDcards are cheap.

Reply
  • 0 in reply to Tamir Michael

    Tamir,

    I would go with MCI + SDCard. It has the best performance/price ratio.
    I'm using the SDcard only for internal use replacing a NAND flash.

    Advantages:
    *MCI in 4 bits mode has the fastest speed.
    *The FS is FAT16/32, so you can read/write the info with a PC.
    *Easy to upgrade with more memory if is necessary.
    *SDcards are cheap.

Children