#include<reg51.h> #include<string.h> #include<stdio.h> #define lcd_data P1 sbit rs=P2^0; sbit rw=P2^1; sbit en=P2^2; unsigned char n[5]="hello"; unsigned char m[]="welcome rakesh"; void cmd_lcd(unsigned char); void write_lcd(char); void delay(unsigned int); void lcd_int() { cmd_lcd(0x38); cmd_lcd(0x0c); cmd_lcd(0x01); cmd_lcd(0x80); } void cmd_lcd(unsigned char x) { x=lcd_data; rs=0; rw=0; en=1; delay(50); en=0; }
void write_lcd(char s) {
s=lcd_data; rs=1; rw=0; en=1; delay(500); en=0; } void delay(unsigned int temp) { unsigned int i,j; for(i=0;i<255;i++); for(j=0;j<temp;j++); }
void main() { void lcd_int(); void write_lcd(n); void delay(500); void cmd_lcd(0x01); void delay(100); void write_lcd(m); void delay(100); }
this code shows following error: Build target 'Target 1' compiling lcdc04.c... LCDC04.C(50): error C161: 'n': formal parameter ignored Target not created
please help me in clearing this...
I would like to forward you a series of books on a collection of subjects to help you with your apparent deficiencies.
You better keep those. It would be irresponsible of me to deprive you of those learning materials. You clearly need them more.
You clearly need them more.
Stop. Stop already. My sides can't take much more of it.
"Stop. Stop already. My sides can't take much more of it."
A truly mature and masterful reply, it's just so well done. You have closed this thread showing incredible skills.
A truly mature and masterful reply, it's just so well done.
At least I am mature enough to use my real name.
Google does a very good job of revealing what you are about.
"At least I am mature enough to use my real name."
Thanks. You proved my point quite nicely.
Well, let's see: so what we have here is one first-time-ever poster in this forum, who appeared out of thin air with the sole apparent purpose of supporting the failed arguments of another person --- whom coincidentally we had also never heard of here before this thread. And you seriously expect anyone to believe you're not just a sock-puppet? Really?
Or not old and wise enough not too, Google searches cut both ways.
... we had also never heard of here before this thread ...
Stop already. I can't take any more. Your logic is, as always, totally infullable.
You must be a right wag at gatherings.
Now that is a proper and good answer ;-)
"Your logic is, as always, totally infullable."
Quiet odd for me to ask, but "infullable"? Even I cudn't do it that bad. Is that even a word?
Try "infallible".
yo're friend,
Zeusti.
<quote>Even I cudn't do it that bad<quote>
I DID NOT SPEAK ANY OF THIS!
This fourem is going down the hill very bad.
Still someone at temps to impersonanate me!
POEPLE WHO NO ME U MUST NO IT WAS NOT ME
Always yo're freind.
(Can you turn off auto-correct with IE10? It thinks it knows how to spell better than me)
"(Can you turn off auto-correct with IE10? It thinks it knows how to spell better than me)"
Random Zeusti don't need auto-correct.
Random Zeusti have very "interesting" spelling and grammar on some days and almost perfect grammar and spelling on other days - all depending on mood. Normally the worst spelling/grammar when taunting Tamir.
<quote>Random Zeusti don't need auto-correct.</quote>
Too right. I like to choose my own quality.
But you remind me. Where is Tapir these days? I miss our extreme intellectual discourses.
For a long time now I have only woken when he posts or when someone pretends to be me. I really HATE that latter one.
Dear sock-puppet, if you think you that's a coherent argument, you're even more deranged than I suspected. If you don't: what possessed you to post it?
if you think ... blah blah blah ...
It was an appropriate response to self-indulgent crassness.
"You must be a right wag at gatherings."
Some people here got beaten at work or at home and this is their place to recover their self-esteem by bullying others. That is why they are so hostile and condescending to others asking questions.
The good thing is that they are fairly easy to spot and you just need to learn to ignore them.