#include<reg51.h> #include<string.h> #include<stdio.h> #define lcd_data P1 sbit rs=P2^0; sbit rw=P2^1; sbit en=P2^2; unsigned char n[5]="hello"; unsigned char m[]="welcome rakesh"; void cmd_lcd(unsigned char); void write_lcd(char); void delay(unsigned int); void lcd_int() { cmd_lcd(0x38); cmd_lcd(0x0c); cmd_lcd(0x01); cmd_lcd(0x80); } void cmd_lcd(unsigned char x) { x=lcd_data; rs=0; rw=0; en=1; delay(50); en=0; }
void write_lcd(char s) {
s=lcd_data; rs=1; rw=0; en=1; delay(500); en=0; } void delay(unsigned int temp) { unsigned int i,j; for(i=0;i<255;i++); for(j=0;j<temp;j++); }
void main() { void lcd_int(); void write_lcd(n); void delay(500); void cmd_lcd(0x01); void delay(100); void write_lcd(m); void delay(100); }
this code shows following error: Build target 'Target 1' compiling lcdc04.c... LCDC04.C(50): error C161: 'n': formal parameter ignored Target not created
please help me in clearing this...
"You must be a right wag at gatherings."
Some people here got beaten at work or at home and this is their place to recover their self-esteem by bullying others. That is why they are so hostile and condescending to others asking questions.
The good thing is that they are fairly easy to spot and you just need to learn to ignore them.
Somehow I find it hard to believe that the individuals you refer too have low esteem or ego, their IQ puts them in smartest-guy-in-the-room category, so I again doubt they are beaten at work, or can't manipulate or plot around that. If you're beaten at work you find a different job, if you're beaten at home you go live some place else, if you're an ineffective team player you pick a different sport.
I can see why there might be hostility if their job was out-sourced to someone who can't tie their shoe laces, or formulate a coherent question.
So do you get beaten because you cheat on your husband, or do you cheat because he beats you?
their IQ puts them in smartest-guy-in-the-room
If this forum ever implements registration it should also require every member to state their IQ rating. Maybe then implement a filter to weed out responses from people who are just not smart enough.
Ian.
(IQ 147)
But maturity and IQ don't go hand-in-hand.
Absolutely correct. And nor do human interaction capabilities go hand-in-hand with IQ.