LPC2361

"when you run a function from one timer the other timers dont work"

So don't do that, then!

That was just a very simplistic example to give you the idea.

"And some functions can take a long time"

So, indeed, you would not call them direct from the timer code!

You could, just as one example, set a flag to indicate that the timer has expired - and test that flag in your main loop...

"when you run a function from one timer the other timers dont work"

So don't do that, then!

That was just a very simplistic example to give you the idea.

"And some functions can take a long time"

So, indeed, you would not call them direct from the timer code!

You could, just as one example, set a flag to indicate that the timer has expired - and test that flag in your main loop...

      // The countdown is running
      if( --timer_1 == 0 )
      {
         // The countdown has reached zero; ie, the timer has expired
         // Set flags and/or call functions as appropriate
      }

"as appropriate" is the key phrase there!

www.8052.com/.../144417

Dear Andrew

you right. The only way is to make sure that the required time is at most or less than the available time. So you must provide in time escape from any running sequence. But will be harder to program :(. That's why they invented multithreading, that you don't worry about that. No offence, I hope

Dorin

Dear Andrew

Forgive me I forgot to say thanks for help.
Thanks man. I appreciate your help.

Dorin

Can i know how to do multithreading in it?