We are running a survey to help us improve the experience for all of our members. If you see the survey appear, please take the time to tell us about your experience if you can.
i need the help of a real good professional who really is top of the game.
we are trying to perfect the design of our own a SMVS with the requirement input 110VDC, output 17VAC 3A through to a simultaneous phasing of 9.6VAC at 4A in the higher harmonic region (theta 7.3). as you know the control of the SMVS operation is critical in getting the phasing correct. we look at the STELLARIS M4F series and think it can achieve the mass inertial calculations in real time. has one of you guys got any experience of the typical design layout with this processor using Keils RTX?
@gally Mimu
Why are you so aggressive?
aggressive? me? no.
who was the one who felt the need to use a profanity? the expert? hah.
A Somewhat Mediocre Voltage Supply can be built using the appropiate controller chip and a couple of mosfets. I see no reason to replace the dedicated controller chip with a microprocessor, the dedicated chips do a much better job.
Erik
PS I HATE unexplained acronyms. Read an article in the widely read EDN which may start like this; " this product consist of a PCB (printed circuit board) which ...."
PPS To qualify for having EDN sent you must check "involved in electronic design" EDN is NOT "Popular Mechanics"
The processors are great at generating PWM output but if the feedback loop dies (or isn't fast enough), real interesting things can happen. That is where a dedicated chip shines. It responds quickly. Especially when there are short-circuit conditions to react to, or impulse loads.
looks like stupidity likes to follow ignorance. you discuss the subject when you don't even know what the subject is. remember i originally said i was after someone who was top of the game. you may think you are, but the more you write just shows how far from that point you are. the only ones you kid are yourselves.
The big question - what are you doing here. You have already got your answer on another forum. Or might you have problems telling the truth?
i originally came here looking for an answer. unfortunately i just got a fool who had to resort to crude name calling and who couldn't admit that he wasn't up to the mark. i respond now simply because your responses amuse me. no doubt there will be some who think that simply because you reply, you must know what you are talking about. it is often said that you can fool all the people some of the time and some of the people all of the time. well, you haven't fooled me once. your comments have just been bluster. nothing but bluster.
i originally came here looking for an answer.
No, you didn't. You just pretended. What you really came here for was showing off (what you believe to be) your superior expertise in a subject. And at that you failed miserably. The only thing you managed to do is getting people mad at you. Forget about ever getting help in this forum. Good bye.
your comments have just been bluster. nothing but bluster and you sole response has been "I REFUSE to state what the acronym stand for"
Now that you have given up. let us please know what it stands for.
PS An amusing anecdote re acronyms. I once responded to a want ad misinterpreting what PLC stood for. I had then no idea, whatsoever what a Programmable Logic Controller was. They hired me anyhow and I learned to do ladder logic which now is on my resume.
interesting. now a pompous fool comes out to support a vanilla fool.