This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Optimizing code for one off variable

Hi,

Taking the code snippet below,

char* ptr  = (char*)0x0000;
short size = 0x100;
short sum  = 0x00;

do {
   sum += *ptr++;
} while (size--)

This will cause C51 to allocate "ptr" and "size" in RAM.

        MOV     R3,#00H
        MOV     R2,#00H
        MOV     R1,#00H
        MOV     DPTR,#pre?1251
        MOVX    @DPTR,PR0

        MOV     DPTR,#size?1252
        MOV     A,#01H
        MOVX    @DPTR,A
        INC     DPTR
        CLR     A
        MOVX    @DPTR,A

and everytime "size" is decremented, or "ptr" is incremented, the values are loaded back into the RAM.

Is there a way to force C51 to not use RAM but use the registers only as "ptr" and "size" will never be used anymore after that. What I mean is, is there a way to force C51 to compile to something like this,

mov dptr, #WORD0(00h)
mov r4, #01h ; r4:r5 = size
mov r5, #00h
mov r6, #00h ; r6:r7 = sum
mov r7, #00h

loop:
movx A, @dptr+#000h
addw 006h, A ; r6:r7 += A

inc  dptr
subw 004h, 001h ; r4:r5--
jnc  loop

; add code to store r6:r7 into RAM

Any advice would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance.

Parents
  • But does the taks actually need to be speeded up by 50% - or, indeed, at all?

    "However it would be tedious"

    So, unless it is really essential, don't do it!

    As has already been suggested, if the performance is adequate, there is no point in messing about trying to optimise it!

Reply
  • But does the taks actually need to be speeded up by 50% - or, indeed, at all?

    "However it would be tedious"

    So, unless it is really essential, don't do it!

    As has already been suggested, if the performance is adequate, there is no point in messing about trying to optimise it!

Children
No data