This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Optimizing code for one off variable

Hi,

Taking the code snippet below,

char* ptr  = (char*)0x0000;
short size = 0x100;
short sum  = 0x00;

do {
   sum += *ptr++;
} while (size--)

This will cause C51 to allocate "ptr" and "size" in RAM.

        MOV     R3,#00H
        MOV     R2,#00H
        MOV     R1,#00H
        MOV     DPTR,#pre?1251
        MOVX    @DPTR,PR0

        MOV     DPTR,#size?1252
        MOV     A,#01H
        MOVX    @DPTR,A
        INC     DPTR
        CLR     A
        MOVX    @DPTR,A

and everytime "size" is decremented, or "ptr" is incremented, the values are loaded back into the RAM.

Is there a way to force C51 to not use RAM but use the registers only as "ptr" and "size" will never be used anymore after that. What I mean is, is there a way to force C51 to compile to something like this,

mov dptr, #WORD0(00h)
mov r4, #01h ; r4:r5 = size
mov r5, #00h
mov r6, #00h ; r6:r7 = sum
mov r7, #00h

loop:
movx A, @dptr+#000h
addw 006h, A ; r6:r7 += A

inc  dptr
subw 004h, 001h ; r4:r5--
jnc  loop

; add code to store r6:r7 into RAM

Any advice would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance.

Parents
  • By manually writing in assembly using registers, I manage to speed up the task by 50%. However it would be tedious to do so as the reason to use C is to simplify coding.
    while wrinting small routines in asm for speed reasons is a very valid approach, it you have to write large amounts of code in asm to achieve your goal, this is the wrong approach unless your product is to ship in millions.
    Wrinting small routines in asm for speed reasons is hardly 'tedious' and, typically, for the very reason they are small it will be write, debug and forget, so the 'tedium' is just once.

    Erik

Reply
  • By manually writing in assembly using registers, I manage to speed up the task by 50%. However it would be tedious to do so as the reason to use C is to simplify coding.
    while wrinting small routines in asm for speed reasons is a very valid approach, it you have to write large amounts of code in asm to achieve your goal, this is the wrong approach unless your product is to ship in millions.
    Wrinting small routines in asm for speed reasons is hardly 'tedious' and, typically, for the very reason they are small it will be write, debug and forget, so the 'tedium' is just once.

    Erik

Children
No data