We are running a survey to help us improve the experience for all of our members. If you see the survey appear, please take the time to tell us about your experience if you can.
Seeks and destroys sea-bound CodeMonkeys... http://i.imgur.com/fDhfx.jpg
--Cpt. Vince Foster 2nd Cannon Place Fort Marcy Park, VA
P.S. I'm bored
since you have often critisited my language, I want to ask if this is a rewording of "NO" that is acceptable in the can.
I tried really hard to understand this without success. It's a 'yes with conditions', but I'm at a loss with the 'acceptable in the can' bit.
Jack Sprat,
What is up with you? Stay focused here, and explain some of your proud moments. I did ask nicely: per request.
So please, with sugar on top, what have you been up to? (Said differently, why should we take Jack Sprat's advice over say "Cpt. Vince's"?)
out of the sardine can came: Will you please tell us what you've worked on? .... One more thing - post a picture of yourself holding a fish above your head and I'll tell you...
I replied to that post (which is directly above in the list: since you have often critisited my language, I want to ask if this is a rewording of "NO" that is acceptable in the can.
Bending that reply in neon: requiring someone to "post a picture of yourself holding a fish above your head" is, in my opinion, a silly, but absolute, way to say "NO"
Erik
Let me help you. Here is a list of accolades of the sardine:
1. Automatic sardine can opener. 2. Embedded forum spammer. 3. Wrote the firmware for a sonar guided sardine fishing boat.
Etc. Nothing that even reaches your knees, Vince.
I'd love to see what you've worked on. I'd find that interesting. You Got Any? At All?
Do you really want to know? If you ask nicely I'll tell you.
Dear Jack Sprat,
Will you please tell us what you've worked on? Maybe some photos; and ad a 'touch of proof' that you did it so *those* people won't be skeptical.
Thanks,
One more thing - post a picture of yourself holding a fish above your head and I'll tell you...
I'm focussed, Vince, I'm focussed. I'm nearly ready. I just need the fish above the head picture. You can disguise your face if you want, then the pentagon will never know you talked. Your secret is safe with me. Pipo and Cyril agree - you need to know. You shall not be denied the truth.
Bending that reply in neon:
No, it's yes, but what about the can?
I just need the fish above the head picture.
before you know it, there will be a sardine under Vince's foot (I think he said he worked on the "Predetor"...). You are hopeless and not very funny, sardinovich.
Predator instead of Predetor.
I asked if it was appropiate where you live
Spelling corrections in direct follow-up posts. Now, why does that give a strong feeling that Pipo isn't sitting too far away from Tamir :)
I was summoned, but refuse to comment in fear of a UAV strike (but I'm on the right side, unless there is something we don't know!). Maybe they can send out their UAVs to clash instead?
"Now, why does that give a strong feeling that Pipo isn't sitting too far away from Tamir :)"
Or Cactus Blip ;)
UAVs.
The Israelis 'pioneered' the UAVs and when the USA decided to get serious about them they had a plan.
A 3-point plan: Long-Range, Short-Range and Close-Range UAVs
They chose the Short-Range to set the standard for the LR and SR platforms. McDonnel Douglas vs Israeli Air Industries.
The fly-off competition was hands-down McDonnell Douglas' UAV system. (Best computer systems I've ever seen). But IAI won the $700M USD contract. "Known as foreign aid."
IAI turned around and purchased McDonnell Douglas equipment since it was way better. IAI had a little accident with one of their UAVs.
They launched it without any real brains, and it flew from [redacted] into the shores of Mexico. IAI asked the US navy to retrieve it.
The USN said "Nope: not our waters."
IAI Asked Mexico to retrieve it.
Mexico said "Yes, but you'll foot the bill."
Never say yes to that: Mexico charged too much and it went into litigation.
Meanwhile, the Bosnian war is kicking up in a bad way. The CIA needs a UAV, so they hire General Atomics to build an aircraft.
General Atomics builds the Predator, and they used MY stuff in it.
The Predator now establishes "The Standard" for UAVs. $700M in USD down the drain... well I'm sure IAI benefited.
McDonalds.
The McDonalds 'pioneered' the burgers and when the kids decided to get serious about them they had a plan.
A 3-point plan: Supersize-Range, Large-Range and Regular-Range burgers.
They chose the Large-Range to set the standard for the LR and SR platforms. Burger King vs McDonalds.
The flip-off competition was hands-down Burger King's burger system. (Best burger systems I've ever seen). But McDonalds won the $7 USD contract. "Known as minimum wage."
McDonalds turned around and purchased Burger King equipment since it was way better. McDonalds had a little accident with one of their burgers.
They launched it without any real meat, and it fried from [mechanically rendered] into the belly of America. McDonalds asked the US food administration to retrieve it.
The USFA said "Nope: not real food."
McDonalds asked America to retrieve it.
America said "Yes, but you'll foot the bill."
Never say yes to that: America charged too much and it went into litigation.
Meanwhile, the Burger war is kicking up in a bad way. The CIA needs a McDonalds, so they hire Admiral Beefsteak to build a mincer.
Admiral Beefsteak builds Arnie, and he used MY stuff in it.
Arnie now establishes "The Standard" for burgers. $7 in USD down the drain... well I'm sure America benefited.
Burgers. The cornerstone of a good conspiracy. -- George Bush, circa one of his better days.
This just gets weirder and weirder.
Ok, you've rumbled me. I admit everything.