This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Timer accuracy

Hello,
I configured a timer to generate a signal every 1 ms.

See below my code about the timer:

TIM_DeInit(TIMx);  // TIM1 Deinitialization *
TIM_InitStructure.TIM_Mode                       = TIM_OCM_CHANNEL_1;
TIM_InitStructure.TIM_OC1_Modes          = TIM_TIMING;
TIM_InitStructure.TIM_Clock_Source       = TIM_CLK_APB;
TIM_InitStructure.TIM_Clock_Edge         = TIM_CLK_EDGE_FALLING;
TIM_InitStructure.TIM_Prescaler          = 0xEF; // period = 5us
TIM_InitStructure.TIM_Pulse_Length_1 = 0xC8; // cycle of 200 period => cycle = 1ms
TIM_Init (TIMx, &TIM_InitStructure);

And the statements inside timer's interrupt:

void TIM1_IRQHandler(void)
{
        // port 3 pin 7 activated
        P37_1;
        // ACK interrupt
        TIM_ClearFlag(TIM1, TIM_FLAG_OC1);      // clear Output Compare 1 flag
        TIM_CounterCmd(TIM1, TIM_CLEAR);        // Reset TIM1 Counter
    VIC0->VAR = 0xFF;                                        // write any value to VIC0 VAR
}

BUT my oscilloscope measured a period of 1.03 ms instead of the 1ms expected.
Normally to generate a pulse every 1.03 ms the TIM_Pulse_Length_1 should be set to 0xCE.
As you can see, the difference between 0xCE and 0xC8 is big.

What can be the cause of this timer's inaccuracy ?
> Problem in PLL configuration ?
> Problem of crystal ?
> Problem in timer configuration ?

Has someone the same problem ?
In advance, thank you

Parents
  • Zeusti is right on this.

    I briefly got caught out by this unexpected reload value when I first started using the STR9.

    It is mentioned in the ST documentation, but I never found an explanation for why this is the reload value.

    I guess that someone far cleverer than me decided that this was a good thing to do.

    As far as I can remember, the STR9 can also generate an interrupt when the count rolls over from 0xFFFF to 0x0000. Is this tied in with the reload value?
    Anyone know?

Reply
  • Zeusti is right on this.

    I briefly got caught out by this unexpected reload value when I first started using the STR9.

    It is mentioned in the ST documentation, but I never found an explanation for why this is the reload value.

    I guess that someone far cleverer than me decided that this was a good thing to do.

    As far as I can remember, the STR9 can also generate an interrupt when the count rolls over from 0xFFFF to 0x0000. Is this tied in with the reload value?
    Anyone know?

Children
No data