We are running a survey to help us improve the experience for all of our members. If you see the survey appear, please take the time to tell us about your experience if you can.
Hello, I configured a timer to generate a signal every 1 ms.
See below my code about the timer:
TIM_DeInit(TIMx); // TIM1 Deinitialization * TIM_InitStructure.TIM_Mode = TIM_OCM_CHANNEL_1; TIM_InitStructure.TIM_OC1_Modes = TIM_TIMING; TIM_InitStructure.TIM_Clock_Source = TIM_CLK_APB; TIM_InitStructure.TIM_Clock_Edge = TIM_CLK_EDGE_FALLING; TIM_InitStructure.TIM_Prescaler = 0xEF; // period = 5us TIM_InitStructure.TIM_Pulse_Length_1 = 0xC8; // cycle of 200 period => cycle = 1ms TIM_Init (TIMx, &TIM_InitStructure);
And the statements inside timer's interrupt:
void TIM1_IRQHandler(void) { // port 3 pin 7 activated P37_1; // ACK interrupt TIM_ClearFlag(TIM1, TIM_FLAG_OC1); // clear Output Compare 1 flag TIM_CounterCmd(TIM1, TIM_CLEAR); // Reset TIM1 Counter VIC0->VAR = 0xFF; // write any value to VIC0 VAR }
BUT my oscilloscope measured a period of 1.03 ms instead of the 1ms expected. Normally to generate a pulse every 1.03 ms the TIM_Pulse_Length_1 should be set to 0xCE. As you can see, the difference between 0xCE and 0xC8 is big.
What can be the cause of this timer's inaccuracy ? > Problem in PLL configuration ? > Problem of crystal ? > Problem in timer configuration ?
Has someone the same problem ? In advance, thank you
I was wondering ... Who is this Trevor Smythe?
Is he some sort of guru?
(no idea who is Trevor Smythe -> en.wikipedia.org/.../Trevor_Smith)
I did a mistake. To take into account that the counter starts at 0xFFFC and not at 0x0000, I used counter(0xFFFC) = counter(0x0000) - 4
@Stefan: For the oscillator, I used the MCB-STR9. Normally the oscillator is well chose.
@all: Now we have 1.006 ms instead of 1.03ms
Here is the guru:
www.facebook.com/.../1406569736
Ah I see.
So that's what a guru looks like.
Glad I'm not one ;)
maybe this an avatar of the professor himself? long tongue, I'm telling you...