We are running a survey to help us improve the experience for all of our members. If you see the survey appear, please take the time to tell us about your experience if you can.
Hi all,
If the processor tries to go back from the test() function to the main() function, the program counter gets always the wrong address - so that an undef handler occurs.... (processor is searching for an programm code in the sdram...). The whole programm is stored in an external nor flash device (0x10000000).
void test(void) { //do some stuff... return; } void main(void) { test(); }
The user stack size is 0x800. That's a short part of the disassembly where the jump to the sdram occurs (the next step after 0x100012D4). According to the map file, the function test() is using the memory space until 0x1000012D8 and the next function starts at 0x100001304. I'm not sure about the space within these two points? All these values are also stored in the nor flash device...
522: return; 0x100012C8 E7980185 LDR R0,[R8,R5,LSL #3] 0x100012CC E3C00001 BIC R0,R0,#0x00000001 0x100012D0 E7880185 STR R0,[R8,R5,LSL #3] 523: } 0x100012D4 E8BD8FF8 LDMIA R13!,{R3-R11,PC} 0x100012D8 544F5250 DD 0x544F5250 0x100012DC 0050495F DD 0x0050495F 0x100012E0 0A50490A DD 0x0A50490A 0x100012E4 00000000 DD 0x00000000 0x100012E8 606E6F64 DD 0x606E6F64 0x100012EC 6E6B2074 DD 0x6E6B2074 0x100012F0 7420776F DD 0x7420776F 0x100012F4 20736968 DD 0x20736968 0x100012F8 6B636170 DD 0x6B636170 0x100012FC 000A7465 DD 0x000A7465 0x10001300 68746520 DD 0x68746520 0x10001304 00000020 DD 0x00000020 39: pbuf->hdr->flag = used;
best regards Howard
Are you using an AT91SAM9263, and booting from the NOR-Flash?
You are right - are you also using one of the atmel controllers?
Please add an "NOP" there, and give it a try.
The problem changed; now the processor is able to call the main function from the test2function() once; if I try the same code a second time, it fails.... the test2function is always called if there was an interrupt. So maybe there is something wrong with my interrupt handler in the startup file....
(It seems some solutions for AT91SAM9263 are made by GNU toolchain.)
Right, atmel use the GNU toolchain to compile their boards.
Hi Howard,
Actually, I don't know anything about ARM9 and ATMEL MCUs.
Some related URLs:
http://www.keil.com/forum/docs/thread14628.asp
http://www.keil.com/forum/docs/thread14480.asp
http://www.keil.com/forum/docs/thread13351.asp
I'm not alone with that problem...
I will try to use the keil startup file together with my lowlevelinit function. So that the only difference between the original keil file and my startup file will be shown below.
; Reset Handler EXPORT Reset_Handler IMPORT LowLevelInit Reset_Handler ; Set pc to actual code location (i.e. not in remap zone) LDR pc, =label NOP label ; Set up temporary stack (Top of the SRAM) LDR r0, = Stack_Top ; get top of the stack MOV sp, r0 ; store top of the stack in register0 ; Call Low level init BL LowLevelInit NOP ; Cache Setup ------------------------------------------------------------------ IF ICACHE_SETUP != 0 MRC p15, 0, R0, c1, c0, 0 ; Enable Instruction Cache ORR R0, R0, #ICACHE_ENABLE MCR p15, 0, R0, c1, c0, 0 ENDIF ; Setup Stack for each mode ---------------------------------------------------- LDR R0, =Stack_Top