• State Not Answered
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 7 replies
  • Subscribers 22 subscribers
  • Views 1385 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
Related
How was your experience today?
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

device database deficiency

erik malund

I set the dot in the device database for 2 UARTs and, basically, every '51 chip came up which, of course, means that 1 UART was enuf to show when 2 UARTs was selected.



Erik

Parents
  • 0 in reply to Jon Ward

    Thanks, I'll look again.

    The Keil database is the best and such fast response is greatly appreciated.

    One suggestion:
    It would be nice to have selections for "kitchen sink" "RF circuitry on chip" "on board FPGA" etc. I can easily see that would make the selection page enormous and needing frequent updates. Thus how about another selection called something like "chips with VERY unusual features that does not fit the mold". That way, if I were looking for a derivative with a kitchen sink, I could reduce the number of chips to examine to, say, 20 and look at them individually.

    Erik

Reply
  • 0 in reply to Jon Ward

    Thanks, I'll look again.

    The Keil database is the best and such fast response is greatly appreciated.

    One suggestion:
    It would be nice to have selections for "kitchen sink" "RF circuitry on chip" "on board FPGA" etc. I can easily see that would make the selection page enormous and needing frequent updates. Thus how about another selection called something like "chips with VERY unusual features that does not fit the mold". That way, if I were looking for a derivative with a kitchen sink, I could reduce the number of chips to examine to, say, 20 and look at them individually.

    Erik

Children
No data