Dear Sirs, Mr. Coppi! ...I use the CAN-Module of a CA-step. Because everything was fine using the Board, I burned it without looking at the errata sheed...I was surprised at the result! Now I want to please You help me avoid another mistake. The behavior can be avoided if a message object is not updated by software when a transmission of the corresponding message object is pending (TXRQ element is set) and the CAN module is active (INIT = 0). Does that mean, if I would disable the CAN module each time I change something (data) in an object and enable it after that everything will be o.K.? The nodes in the CAN system ignore the remote frame with the identifier=0 and no data frame is triggered by this remote frame. Is this another or additional possibility? Is there a way to disable only the identifier '0'? I'm not so sure if I did understand the errata well, so please don't wonder about this questions. Do You know about a distributor who could have a flash device of the C164? (It's really expensive for me to burn them so often and this could prevent al least wrong startup configurations other mistakes which are not step-specific?!) Thanks a lot for helping me hannes P.S. why differs the behaviour using the RAM of the Board instead of OTP??