• State Not Answered
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 4 replies
  • Subscribers 119 subscribers
  • Views 7584 views
  • Users 0 members are here
2025 survey

We are running a survey to help us improve the experience for all of our members. If you see the survey appear, please take the time to tell us about your experience if you can.

Options
How was your experience today?
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

CMSIS DSP Correlation

romain

Hello,

I'm working on a real-time treatment using a correlation on ARM Cortex-M4 (kinetis k60), so the duration of the treatment is important for me.

So I tried several size of input parameters and  different functions to be as fast as possible.

But there is something I don't understand:

I tried arm_correlate_fast_q31 and arm_correlate_q31.

According to the documentation, the 'fast' function should be faster but less accurate ?

I measured the times and it seems the basic correlation is faster than the fast.

Example in my case:

arm_correlate_fast_q31(din0, 1024, din1, 1024, dout) > 367 ms

arm_correlate_q31(din0, 1024, din1, 1024, dout) >          272 ms

I use the last version of CMSIS (V1.4.5 b) and GCC.

Are there something I did wrong or that I misunderstood ?

Thank you,

Romain

0