• State Accepted Answer
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 1 reply
  • Subscribers 121 subscribers
  • Views 479 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
Related
How was your experience today?
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

FUSA 6.16.2 with c++17

DS1

Is it safe to use 6.16.2 safety compiler with C++17 ( community) ?

Does the community version makes it any less safe? 

Parents
  • +1

    Hi

    My name is Stephen and I work at Arm.

    Sorry, the "C++17 (Community)" feature is not qualified for FuSa use.

    Please refer to the AC6.16.2 FuSa Safety Manual for more information.

    developer.arm.com/.../6-16-2LTS

    also says:
    The command-line option descriptions and related information in the Arm Compiler Reference Guide describe all the features that Arm Compiler for Embedded FuSa supports. Any features not documented are not supported and are used at your own risk. You are responsible for making sure that any generated code using community features is operating correctly. See Support level definitions.

    Stephen

Reply
  • +1

    Hi

    My name is Stephen and I work at Arm.

    Sorry, the "C++17 (Community)" feature is not qualified for FuSa use.

    Please refer to the AC6.16.2 FuSa Safety Manual for more information.

    developer.arm.com/.../6-16-2LTS

    also says:
    The command-line option descriptions and related information in the Arm Compiler Reference Guide describe all the features that Arm Compiler for Embedded FuSa supports. Any features not documented are not supported and are used at your own risk. You are responsible for making sure that any generated code using community features is operating correctly. See Support level definitions.

    Stephen

Children
No data