Arm Community
Site
Search
User
Site
Search
User
Support forums
Arm Development Studio forum
ARM PMU - Event 0x56 - No instructions for issue (A8)
Locked
Locked
Replies
5 replies
Subscribers
119 subscribers
Views
4459 views
Users
0 members are here
Options
Share
More actions
Related
How was your experience today?
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion
ARM PMU - Event 0x56 - No instructions for issue (A8)
Prabindh Sundareson
over 12 years ago
Note: This was originally posted on 30th October 2012 at
http://forums.arm.com
[font=Arial][size=2]I am using peemuperf (
https://github.com/prabindh/peemuperf/blob/master/README.md
) to get various cache profile results from ARM PMU, and some specific EMIF counters available in TI processors. I am currently looking at one of the A8 processors. In ARM Performance monitoring unit, the SEL field (event ID) of [/size][/font]EVTSEL register can be used to select the event ID.[size=2] In this, 0x56 is defined to indicate "[/size]0x56 ==> Increment for every cycle that no instructions are available for issue[size=2]". [/size]
[font=Arial][size=2] [/size][/font]
[font=Arial][size=2]With the goal of finding cycles lost because CPU is waiting for I-cache miss and refill to be available, when 0x56 is used, I see some correlation, but with below issues:[/size][/font]
[font=Arial][size=2] [/size][/font]
[size=2]- [/size][font=Arial][size=2]At no-load conditions (no UI or other application, CPU load being negligible), this counter gives cycles equal to that of CPU clock speed. In a 720 MHz processor, I see 720M cycles. This does not match with the description. What is the explanation ?[/size][/font]
[font=Arial][size=2] [/size][/font]
[size=2]- [/size][font=Arial][size=2]At high loads, there is a more meaningful number coming out of the counter, but still it appears to be high, that indicates to me that this cycle count is not just that of CPU waiting for I-cache refills.[/size][/font]
[font=Arial][size=2] [/size][/font]
[font=Arial][size=2]Is there a better explanation/ validated results available ?[/size][/font]
[font=Arial][size=2] [/size][/font]
0
Quote