• Locked Locked
  • Replies 2 replies
  • Subscribers 119 subscribers
  • Views 4230 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
Related
How was your experience today?
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

PL390 GIC Interrupt Grouping

Stefan Kalkowski
Parents
  • Arm Employee Badge
    Note: This was originally posted on 25th July 2012 at http://forums.arm.com

    Do you really mean the PL390, or the integrated IC in the MPCore?  Not that it matters too much at this point.

    I think this is a GICv1 vs GICv2 spec thing which I've hit in the past.  In GICv2 the secure copy of the GICD_CTLR has enable bits for group 0 and 1.  In GICv1 the secure GICD_CTRL is _only_ required to have the group 0 enable bit, it is IMPLEMENTATION DEFINED whether bit 1 is the group 1 enable.  :-(  The PL390/GIC-390 (which is GICv1) does not implement this bit.
Reply
  • Arm Employee Badge
    Note: This was originally posted on 25th July 2012 at http://forums.arm.com

    Do you really mean the PL390, or the integrated IC in the MPCore?  Not that it matters too much at this point.

    I think this is a GICv1 vs GICv2 spec thing which I've hit in the past.  In GICv2 the secure copy of the GICD_CTLR has enable bits for group 0 and 1.  In GICv1 the secure GICD_CTRL is _only_ required to have the group 0 enable bit, it is IMPLEMENTATION DEFINED whether bit 1 is the group 1 enable.  :-(  The PL390/GIC-390 (which is GICv1) does not implement this bit.
Children
No data