Arm Community
Site
Search
User
Site
Search
User
Groups
Research Collaboration and Enablement
DesignStart
Education Hub
Innovation
Open Source Software and Platforms
Forums
AI and ML forum
Architectures and Processors forum
Arm Development Platforms forum
Arm Development Studio forum
Arm Virtual Hardware forum
Automotive forum
Compilers and Libraries forum
Graphics, Gaming, and VR forum
High Performance Computing (HPC) forum
Infrastructure Solutions forum
Internet of Things (IoT) forum
Keil forum
Morello Forum
Operating Systems forum
SoC Design and Simulation forum
中文社区论区
Blogs
AI and ML blog
Announcements
Architectures and Processors blog
Automotive blog
Graphics, Gaming, and VR blog
High Performance Computing (HPC) blog
Infrastructure Solutions blog
Innovation blog
Internet of Things (IoT) blog
Operating Systems blog
Research Articles
SoC Design and Simulation blog
Tools, Software and IDEs blog
中文社区博客
Support
Arm Support Services
Documentation
Downloads
Training
Arm Approved program
Arm Design Reviews
Community Help
More
Cancel
Support forums
Arm Development Studio forum
AMBA AHB
Jump...
Cancel
Locked
Locked
Replies
2 replies
Subscribers
121 subscribers
Views
2733 views
Users
0 members are here
Options
Share
More actions
Cancel
Related
How was your experience today?
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion
AMBA AHB
Offline
sandesh shetty
over 9 years ago
Note: This was originally posted on 10th July 2012 at
http://forums.arm.com
Hi,
I have been working on AMBA AHB slave design. I have come across a deadend.
The problem is as follow.
When a master inserts a busy transaction indicated by the HTRANS as 01. What should be the condition of HREADY from the slave.
The spec says that the slave should provide a non zero wait state to the busy inserted byt the master.
However what should be the status of HREADY when the slave itself is busy and is not able to complete the previous transaction.
Kindly help me with this if possible.
Regards,
sandesh shetty
Parents
Offline
Colin Campbell
over 9 years ago
Note: This was originally posted on 12th July 2012 at
http://forums.arm.com
Sandesh,
If a slave is being asked to do something (a nonseq or seq) access, it can add wait states using HREADY during the data phase for those transfers,
But if the slave is not being asked to do anything (so busy or idle transfers), there is no reason for the slave to need to add wait states, so the HREADY signal must be driven high for the data phases of those transfers.
When you say "the slave itself is busy", what is it busy with such that it can't just check HTRANS to see if it just needs to return a default HREADY=1 response for the idle/busy transfer request, or hold HREADY=0 for the nonseq/seq transfer request ?
JD
Cancel
Up
0
Down
Cancel
Reply
Offline
Colin Campbell
over 9 years ago
Note: This was originally posted on 12th July 2012 at
http://forums.arm.com
Sandesh,
If a slave is being asked to do something (a nonseq or seq) access, it can add wait states using HREADY during the data phase for those transfers,
But if the slave is not being asked to do anything (so busy or idle transfers), there is no reason for the slave to need to add wait states, so the HREADY signal must be driven high for the data phases of those transfers.
When you say "the slave itself is busy", what is it busy with such that it can't just check HTRANS to see if it just needs to return a default HREADY=1 response for the idle/busy transfer request, or hold HREADY=0 for the nonseq/seq transfer request ?
JD
Cancel
Up
0
Down
Cancel
Children
No data