Arm Community
Site
Search
User
Site
Search
User
Groups
Education Hub
Distinguished Ambassadors
Open Source Software and Platforms
Research Collaboration and Enablement
Forums
AI and ML forum
Architectures and Processors forum
Arm Development Platforms forum
Arm Development Studio forum
Arm Virtual Hardware forum
Automotive forum
Compilers and Libraries forum
Graphics, Gaming, and VR forum
High Performance Computing (HPC) forum
Infrastructure Solutions forum
Internet of Things (IoT) forum
Keil forum
Morello forum
Operating Systems forum
SoC Design and Simulation forum
SystemReady Forum
Blogs
AI and ML blog
Announcements
Architectures and Processors blog
Automotive blog
Graphics, Gaming, and VR blog
High Performance Computing (HPC) blog
Infrastructure Solutions blog
Internet of Things (IoT) blog
Operating Systems blog
SoC Design and Simulation blog
Tools, Software and IDEs blog
Support
Arm Support Services
Documentation
Downloads
Training
Arm Approved program
Arm Design Reviews
Community Help
More
Cancel
Support forums
Arm Virtual Hardware forum
How can I emulate an ARM Cortex-M processor cycle-accurately?
Jump...
Cancel
State
Not Answered
Replies
0 replies
Subscribers
9 subscribers
Views
85 views
Users
0 members are here
Cycle Models
Cortex-M
Fixed Virtual Platforms (FVPs)
Emulation & Virtualization
Arm Virtual Hardware
Options
Share
More actions
Cancel
Related
How was your experience today?
How can I emulate an ARM Cortex-M processor cycle-accurately?
Mateusz
13 days ago
Can I emulate an ARM Cortex-M processor cycle-accurately? Preferably as part of some microcontroller (i.e., also emulating Flash and RAM). How?
For example, I want to be able to measure how many CPU cycles it takes to execute a given part of a program, but without using real hardware.
It seems that in the past I could use
Arm Cycle Models
for this purpose, but they are end-of-life now (
community.arm.com/.../ip-exchange-and-cycle-models-end-of-life-update
)
. On the other hand, Arm Virtual Hardware or Fixed Virtual Platforms are based on Fast Models (don't they?) that seem to be only functionally accurate, so they won't give me the correct number of elapsed cycles.