This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Hard Fault in cortex m4

Hello All,

Good Morning!

I am working on Cortex m4.

I have read following about hard fault ,

"Bus Fault: detects memory access errors on instruction fetch, data read/write, interrupt vector fetch, and register stacking (save/restore) on interrupt (entry/exit)

Memory Management Fault: detects memory access violations to regions that are defined in the Memory Management Unit (MPU); for example code execution from a memory region with read/write access only.

Usage Fault: detects execution of undefined instructions, unaligned memory access for load/store multiple. When enabled, divide-by-zero and other unaligned memory accesses are also detected. Hard Fault: is caused by Bus Fault, Memory Management Fault, or Usage Fault if their handler cannot be executed"

Can anyone please explain with examples about Bus, Memory, Usage fault?

Can you please share any good links to read more about them in reference with ARM cortex m4 architecture?

Further, I have following code written in C running on cortex m4,

typedef struct {

  uint32_t nodeId;

  uint32_t systemId;

  int8_t serialNumber[16];

}sysConfig_t;

typedef struct {

  pktHeader_t pktHeader;

  uint8_t data[120];

}packet_t;

void *data;     //(this is pointer to array, i don't know exact alignment of this array )

packet_t *pkt = (uint8_t *)data;

sysConfig_t *sysData;

sysData = (sysConfig_t *)pkt->data;

printf(" %d %d ",sysData->nodeId, sysData->systemId);

I am getting Hard fault at printf statement. Why?

Can you please help?

According to me cortex m4 is based on arm v6 which supports handling unaligned addresses.

Can we discuss?

Thanks for reading my post.

Thanks

Hemant Undale.

Parents
  • If you are creating misaligned pointers to structs or double words, then you must use the __packed qualifier in order to ensure that the compiler does not use LDRD and LDM instructions, e.g.:

    typedef struct {
      uint64_t value;
    } unsafe_t;
    
    uint64_t func(unsafe_t *p)
    {
      return p->value; // Likely produces LDRD
    }
    

    will likely fault, whereas:

    typedef __packed struct {
      uint64_t value;
    } safe_t;
    
    uint64_t func(safe_t *p)
    {
      return p->value; // Likely produces 2x LDR
    }
    

    should work.

    Cortex-M4 implements the ARMv7-M architecture and does support unaligned transactions (assuming that CCR.UNALIGN_TRP is set to zero).

    If the HardFault occurs regardless of what is placed in the printf, e.g. printf("helloworld");, then I suspect the problem you are encountering likely relates to not having ported these functions, or semihosting not being supported by the debugger.

    hth

    Simon.

Reply
  • If you are creating misaligned pointers to structs or double words, then you must use the __packed qualifier in order to ensure that the compiler does not use LDRD and LDM instructions, e.g.:

    typedef struct {
      uint64_t value;
    } unsafe_t;
    
    uint64_t func(unsafe_t *p)
    {
      return p->value; // Likely produces LDRD
    }
    

    will likely fault, whereas:

    typedef __packed struct {
      uint64_t value;
    } safe_t;
    
    uint64_t func(safe_t *p)
    {
      return p->value; // Likely produces 2x LDR
    }
    

    should work.

    Cortex-M4 implements the ARMv7-M architecture and does support unaligned transactions (assuming that CCR.UNALIGN_TRP is set to zero).

    If the HardFault occurs regardless of what is placed in the printf, e.g. printf("helloworld");, then I suspect the problem you are encountering likely relates to not having ported these functions, or semihosting not being supported by the debugger.

    hth

    Simon.

Children