• State Not Answered
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 6 replies
  • Subscribers 349 subscribers
  • Views 7988 views
  • Users 0 members are here
2025 survey

We are running a survey to help us improve the experience for all of our members. If you see the survey appear, please take the time to tell us about your experience if you can.

Options
Related
How was your experience today?
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

TRANSFER CONTINUE AFTER ERROR RESPONSE FROM SLAVE

Vishal

Hello everyone,

I want to understand the transfer continuation process from AHB MASTER during ERROR response from AHB SLAVE.

As specified in the AMBA Specifications (Rev 2.0) IHI0011A_AMBA_SPEC.pdf section 3.9.4 page no 3-23 :

3.9.4 Error response

If a slave provides an ERROR response then the master may choose to cancel the

remaining transfers in the burst. However, this is not a strict requirement and it is also

acceptable for the master to continue the remaining transfers in the burst.

As mentioned above in the bold style : It is also acceptable for the master to continue the remaining transfers in the burst.

I have described the ERROR response from the SLAVE (hresp[1:0] = 2'b01) as shown in the figure below.

SLAVE drives ERROR response at time 75 ns with hready low. Hence MASTER detects ERROR response at 85 ns  with HREADY low.

Now, if the MASTER wants to continue the current transfer; then how can it?

Can the MASTER drive address A4 (for which MASTER has received the ERROR response) at time 85 ns with SEQUENTIAL transfer (htrans[1:0] = 2'b11), though HREADY is low to continue the current transfer ? ERROR RESP MASTER CONTINUE.jpg

Parents
  • 0 in reply to Yasuhiko Koumoto

    Dear yasuhihokoumoto,

    So, should the MASTER forget the 0x000000A4 address and it's related data though it is failed?

    Should the MASTER also forget the 0x000000A6 address and it's related data though it is still remaining?

    Can't the MASTER drive address 0x000000A6 at time 95 ns as it is still remaining ?

    Best Regards,

    Vishal

Reply
  • 0 in reply to Yasuhiko Koumoto

    Dear yasuhihokoumoto,

    So, should the MASTER forget the 0x000000A4 address and it's related data though it is failed?

    Should the MASTER also forget the 0x000000A6 address and it's related data though it is still remaining?

    Can't the MASTER drive address 0x000000A6 at time 95 ns as it is still remaining ?

    Best Regards,

    Vishal

Children
  • 0 in reply to Vishal

    Hello Vishal,

    So, should the MASTER forget the 0x000000A4 address and it's related data though it is failed?

    Yes, the 0x000000A4 had not been accepted by the SLAVE.

    Should the MASTER also forget the 0x000000A6 address and it's related data though it is still remaining?

    No, the 0x000000A6 will be accepted by the SLAVE because HREADY at 95 ns (strictly speaking HREADY before at 105ns should be seen)  is high.

    I am sorry for the comment of "proceed the transaction of address 0x000000A8 from the time 95 ns". It was wrong.

    From the 95 ns, not the 0x000000A8 but  the 0x000000A6 can be taken over.

    Let me excuse myself. I sometimes mistook the relationship between address and data because AHB is the pipelined transaction.

    Can't the MASTER drive address 0x000000A6 at time 95 ns as it is still remaining ?

    So, the MASTER can drive address 0x000000A6 at time 95 ns.

    Best regards,

    Yasuhiko Koumoto.