Arm Community
Arm Community
  • Site
  • User
  • Site
  • Search
  • User
Arm Community blogs
Arm Community blogs
Embedded and Microcontrollers blog Beta release of Yocto-based BSP for VIA VAB-820 and AMOS-820
  • Blogs
  • Mentions
  • Sub-Groups
  • Tags
  • Jump...
  • Cancel
More blogs in Arm Community blogs
  • AI blog

  • Announcements

  • Architectures and Processors blog

  • Automotive blog

  • Embedded and Microcontrollers blog

  • Internet of Things (IoT) blog

  • Laptops and Desktops blog

  • Mobile, Graphics, and Gaming blog

  • Operating Systems blog

  • Servers and Cloud Computing blog

  • SoC Design and Simulation blog

  • Tools, Software and IDEs blog

Tags
  • yocto
  • single board computers
  • Cortex-A9
  • i.mx6q
  • via
  • industry news
  • freescale
  • quad-core
  • beta
  • i.mx6
Actions
  • RSS
  • More
  • Cancel
Related blog posts
Related forum threads

Beta release of Yocto-based BSP for VIA VAB-820 and AMOS-820

Gergely Imreh
Gergely Imreh
April 21, 2015

VIA Embedded has so far two Freescale i.MX6Q based products, the VAB-820 board and the matching AMOS-820 system. We have started to move from LTIB-based BSP images to Yocto recently for multiple reasons.

VAB_AMOS_820_Linux.jpg

The first, very practical one is that Freescale and the community around it has moved onto Yocto for quite a while now. They are core supporters of the project, and we can see that that they are putting a lot of effort into it.

Second, connected reason is that we see the value very much as well, and want to make sure that both we and our customers can take advantage of the improvements. Yocto enables very interesting use cases, and should change quite a bit how companies are thinking about BSPs. It makes possible separating machine support and bootable image generation. A new product added to the existing code can take advantages of (hopefully) tried and tested OS images for specific use cases. Updating machine support (meaning mostly the kernel and u-boot) does not have to wait until a new version of the OS image is released, but can be developed parallel.

The good things also come with a steeper learning curve, though, both for us and for those who want to customize the generated images. To start learning, we have just released the beta version of the new BSP. It's still under development, but should be a good starting point.

What's your experience with Embedded BSPs? Do you use Yocto, or found something else more suitable for your workflow?

Anonymous
Parents
  • Gergely Imreh
    Gergely Imreh over 9 years ago

    Some quick ideas: Probably the quickest would be to create your own working kernel git repo based on the available kernel and adding all the patches you'd like, and use that repo's address in the recipes to create your kernel. So make a repo that is Freescale Kernel + VIA patches + driver backports. This is as opposed to Freescale kernel + VIA patches alone as it is in the current recipes.

    Also, a new BSP with 3.14 should be come out not too far in the future, and in that case no backporting is needed. There's an effort to upstream the VIA patches for even more compatibility, but there's no set timeline for that, just work in progress.

    And just to note, in case of significant volume of hardware, we also provide ARM software engineering services for exactly these kinds of situations.

    • Cancel
    • Up 0 Down
    • Reply
    • More
    • Cancel
Comment
  • Gergely Imreh
    Gergely Imreh over 9 years ago

    Some quick ideas: Probably the quickest would be to create your own working kernel git repo based on the available kernel and adding all the patches you'd like, and use that repo's address in the recipes to create your kernel. So make a repo that is Freescale Kernel + VIA patches + driver backports. This is as opposed to Freescale kernel + VIA patches alone as it is in the current recipes.

    Also, a new BSP with 3.14 should be come out not too far in the future, and in that case no backporting is needed. There's an effort to upstream the VIA patches for even more compatibility, but there's no set timeline for that, just work in progress.

    And just to note, in case of significant volume of hardware, we also provide ARM software engineering services for exactly these kinds of situations.

    • Cancel
    • Up 0 Down
    • Reply
    • More
    • Cancel
Children
No Data
Embedded and Microcontrollers blog
  • Formally verifying a floating-point division routine with Gappa – part 2

    Simon Tatham
    Simon Tatham
    A method of testing whether a numerical error analysis using Gappa really matches the code it is intended to describe.
    • September 4, 2025
  • Formally verifying a floating-point division routine with Gappa – part 1

    Simon Tatham
    Simon Tatham
    Learn the basics of using Gappa for numerical error analysis, using floating-point division in Arm machine code as a case study.
    • September 4, 2025
  • Adapting Kubernetes for high-performance IoT Edge deployments

    Alexandre Peixoto Ferreira
    Alexandre Peixoto Ferreira
    In this blog post, we address heterogeneity in IoT edge deployments using Kubernetes.
    • August 21, 2024