Hi, I'm Android device developer, and using Streamline for checking Mali-GPU performance status.
Recently, I find AGI(Android GPU Inspector).https://community.arm.com/arm-community-blogs/b/architectures-and-processors-blog/posts/total-compute-developer-accessAccording to this article, AGI is also developed by arm.
Q1May I know advantage of AGI compared to Streamline from Mali-GPU Android device point of view ? I've checked that there are many GPU counters in AGI(System profiling) compared with Streamline, in case of Mali G57 Android device. AGI : about 280 GPU countersStreamline : about 80 GPU countersIf arm recommend to use AGI for Android device, I'd like to know the reason.
Q2CUI command is supported on AGI like Streamline ?In case of Streamline, I know that CUI is supported.(streamline_me.py and Streamline-cli)
Thank you !
Best Regards
>AGI is developed by Google, and Arm contribute. Noted, I misunderstood that AGI is mainly developed by Arm.>But I'll get someone from the Streamline team to give more & better comparison information for you...Thanks for your cooperation !It would be nice to know feedback from someone who is familiar with both tools.