• Locked Locked
  • Replies 4 replies
  • Subscribers 137 subscribers
  • Views 4805 views
  • Users 0 members are here
2025 survey

We are running a survey to help us improve the experience for all of our members. If you see the survey appear, please take the time to tell us about your experience if you can.

Options
Related
How was your experience today?
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Depth texture linearization banding on Mali 400

Stephane Jacoby
Note: This was originally posted on 19th June 2013 at http://forums.arm.com

Hello Mali devs,

We are working on an application that performs depth buffer based post processing effects, mainly for fog. We are using 24bit depth for the main scene. However when sampling this depth, the results are very banded (see attachment) due to the non linear nature of the depth buffer and Mali400's mediump 0-1 precision (2^-10 I believe). With most depth values lying in the 0.96-1.0 range, the precision is obviously insufficient. Are there any workarounds that would allow use to leverage the non fractional range of mediump floats? I suspect there isn't however wanted to make sure as the platform does provide depth24 and depth texture extensions. The option of vertex based fogging is an alternative, however, we hope to stay away from that due to the added global cost of the technique.

Many thanks,

Stephane
Parents
  • Note: This was originally posted on 24th June 2013 at http://forums.arm.com

    Thanks McGeagh,

    That's what I figured. Though our app is very vertex heavy, it's probably still heavier on the pixel side. Obviously, per vertex fog does mean modifying/updating every shader in the product (and there are a lot) rather than the single post processing step, but definitely doable if we want to maintain the effect. This is a non issue on the T-604 correct? We don't have a device handy, however, I believe it does do higher precision in fragment shader than the 400-MP.

    Best,
    Stephane

    Hello stepjac,

    With most applications that we see, the vertex shader is usually very under utilised. Moving the fogging over to the vertex shader should give you a much better depth range than what you are currently seeing, with little performance impact (assuming you are currently not vertex bound).
    If you have a development platform, you can see how utilised each core is with our performance analysis tool, DS-5.
    I hope this helps answer your question. Please let us know the outcome, and feel free to ask us any further questions.

    Kind Regards,

    McGeagh

Reply
  • Note: This was originally posted on 24th June 2013 at http://forums.arm.com

    Thanks McGeagh,

    That's what I figured. Though our app is very vertex heavy, it's probably still heavier on the pixel side. Obviously, per vertex fog does mean modifying/updating every shader in the product (and there are a lot) rather than the single post processing step, but definitely doable if we want to maintain the effect. This is a non issue on the T-604 correct? We don't have a device handy, however, I believe it does do higher precision in fragment shader than the 400-MP.

    Best,
    Stephane

    Hello stepjac,

    With most applications that we see, the vertex shader is usually very under utilised. Moving the fogging over to the vertex shader should give you a much better depth range than what you are currently seeing, with little performance impact (assuming you are currently not vertex bound).
    If you have a development platform, you can see how utilised each core is with our performance analysis tool, DS-5.
    I hope this helps answer your question. Please let us know the outcome, and feel free to ask us any further questions.

    Kind Regards,

    McGeagh

Children
No data