• State Not Answered
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 11 replies
  • Subscribers 21 subscribers
  • Views 2729 views
  • Users 0 members are here
2025 survey

We are running a survey to help us improve the experience for all of our members. If you see the survey appear, please take the time to tell us about your experience if you can.

Options
Related
How was your experience today?
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

C51:( LINk Error) fatal error: application calls too many recursions.

Tian Hongwu

while using Keil8.04 compiling and link, there is a fatal error:
*** WARNING L13: RECURSIVE CALL TO SEGMENT SEGMENT: ?CO?MAIN CALLER: ?PR?DISP_MOTORSETUP?MAIN
*** WARNING L13: RECURSIVE CALL TO SEGMENT SEGMENT: ?CO?MAIN CALLER: ?PR?_LCD_SHOWCHAR?MAIN
*** WARNING L13: RECURSIVE CALL TO SEGMENT SEGMENT: ?CO?MAIN CALLER: ?PR?_LCD_SHOWHZ?MAIN
*** WARNING L13: RECURSIVE CALL TO SEGMENT SEGMENT: ?CO?MAIN CALLER: ?PR?_LCD_SHOWSTR?MAIN
*** WARNING L13: RECURSIVE CALL TO SEGMENT SEGMENT: ?CO?MAIN CALLER: ?PR?DISP_CYCLICSETUP?MAIN
*** WARNING L13: RECURSIVE CALL TO SEGMENT SEGMENT: ?CO?MAIN CALLER: ?PR?DISP_MOTORRUNSETUI?MAIN
*** WARNING L13: RECURSIVE CALL TO SEGMENT SEGMENT: ?CO?MAIN CALLER: ?PR?DISP_GENERALSETUI?MAIN
*** WARNING L13: RECURSIVE CALL TO SEGMENT SEGMENT: ?CO?MAIN CALLER: ?PR?DISPAR_TIME?MAIN
*** WARNING L13: RECURSIVE CALL TO SEGMENT SEGMENT: ?CO?MAIN CALLER: ?PR?DISPAR_STARTTIME?MAIN
*** WARNING L13: RECURSIVE CALL TO SEGMENT SEGMENT: ?CO?MAIN CALLER: ?PR?DISPAR_ALARMTEMP?MAIN
*** WARNING L13: RECURSIVE CALL TO SEGMENT SEGMENT: ?CO?MAIN CALLER: ?PR?SETUP_MOTORRUNPAR?MAIN
*** FATAL ERROR L232: APPLICATION CONTAINS TOO MANY RECURSIONS
Target not created.

I don't konw why, if there are some error while use function pointer or the pro struct include too many layers? waiting for your idears. this problem has pazzled me several days. If mesessary, i can upload my code for you !

Parents
  • 0 in reply to Tian Hongwu

    That is a selectable way to avoid function pointer

    you are using TWO things that the '51 architecture is singularily unsuited for "function pointers' and "recursive calls".

    What I suggested was to get rid of BOTH.

    If 'programmers convenience' is more important to you that 'process effiecienmcy' then what you are doing is just fine, but the overhead of using these twu things that the '51 must be "wrangled into" performing is very likely to get you on trouble some day.

    The case of a "working code" falling apart the day you are asked to make a "nominal addition" is not unheard of.

    Erik

Reply
  • 0 in reply to Tian Hongwu

    That is a selectable way to avoid function pointer

    you are using TWO things that the '51 architecture is singularily unsuited for "function pointers' and "recursive calls".

    What I suggested was to get rid of BOTH.

    If 'programmers convenience' is more important to you that 'process effiecienmcy' then what you are doing is just fine, but the overhead of using these twu things that the '51 must be "wrangled into" performing is very likely to get you on trouble some day.

    The case of a "working code" falling apart the day you are asked to make a "nominal addition" is not unheard of.

    Erik

Children
No data