All,
I'm working on tightening things up to stop the torrential influx of spam. The process needs to be refined a bit.
Thanks for your patience as we continue to address this.
Dave
The lengthy maintenance window was due to issues unrelated to the forum. We are validating forum modifications at the moment which should address many of the concerns that have been raised.
We recognize the value of the forum to our users and take it very seriously. As such, any changes have to be carefully considered and tested before deployment.
Today I have failed several times with the captcha - maybe the "quality" has been increased.
It's just that the automatic captcha processors are better than most human beings, so trying to get a captcha to stop spam will block normal users more efficiently than the spammers.
That recently happened to me with another site.
I ended up cleaning my glasses.
Problem was then resolved.
Cleaning glasses doesn't help much when some characters are totally squashed so there is just an indication that there is one or more extra character hidden in there.
The majority of images have been easy but I have had three today that have been way past what I can guess. All images with digits are trivial to see. Some of the text images have zero distortion. But a few of the text-based have been very garbled.
Have agree with Per here, had several of the letter based captcha's choke, the number based ones less so.
Not sure if it's case sensitive, or just lacks the ability to deal with multiple interpretations of what the text should read.
The captcha doesnt work well. The captcha wanted me to type "always" instead of which i type "alwasy" while typing very fast. and clicked the post button immediately without verifying. i thought that this would result to error, and a new recaptcha may be generated. but SURPRISE! SURPRISE!!.
the same happened while posting this thread too. i typed 'seh' instead of 'she'. still worked. added the above line later. :P
PS: I may be exposing the loop-hole, but since i have no other option left but use the forum, i m writing it here.
To Dhaval Solanki,
The below links provide Keil.com Webmaster's email.
http://www.keil.com/forum/23116/ http://www.keil.com/forum/17046/
Search '@'
I think it works as intended, i.e. I think that the server has a "good enough" setting where they allow one or two characters to be incorrect while still accepting the answer.
There would be too large number of fails from valid users if it required 100% correct answers.
This is waaaay outside my expertise, but my banks website switches to a new window after the user id is entered. Thus the user ID and the password can not be entered simultneously. Again I have no idea if this would improve the spam resistance, but if it does, great
Dear David, http://www.keil.com/forum/57375/
Too many spams may turn away the genuine posters.
Acknowledged.
www.keil.com/forum/threads.asp
Test Only
Thanks for the test!
URLs are fine. Actual links are not.
This and the other new checks in place are stop-gap solutions. We're testing an account/login system at the moment. Swapping out the entire forum (with 14+ years of data) is not an option for a short-term solution, so out comes the duct tape.
On the up side, the CAPTCHA is no longer necessary with the account-based system, so everyone should be happy. Or hpapy as the case may be.
I appreciate everyone's patience, and understand your frustration with the spam and CAPTCHA. We find it equally annoying. Makes we want to crowd-source spammer identification.
(who is trying to read an indecipherable CAPTCHA) (Which is provided by Google.)
Apparently not:
keil.com/forum/57755
I had to take the "www" off to get past the HTTP Error 500.100