This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Dirty Scintilla based text editor

uVision 9.50 to 9.54a.

Why all keep a silence?

Since the version 9.06 the author of text editor did many mistakes:
The fonts don't display correctly, color scheme is wrong, what happen?

This is the author of the new Scintilla based editor:
file: a51.prop.def
# Define uVision editor settings for A51 Assembler files
# Created by Evangelos Ganotopoulos 22 FEB 2012
# Version : Draft

When the dear Keil will be pleased to fix this filth?

Parents
  • Hi Hans!

    Thank you very much!

    There are numerous errors in versions after 9.50, namely:
    1/ Courier type won't switch. When chosen, it shifts to Courier New.
    2/ The colouring of syntax is careless.
    3/ The characters '#' '@' and others are not highlighted in Assembler control statements and in CPU instructions (for example, in MOVX A, @DPTR MOVX and A they were highligthed, and in @DPTR they are not)
    '@' and '#' are key characters of the Assembler and must be highlighted!
    4/ The operators are strangerly reflected as well (i.e., the comma in sources is highlighted and the full-stop is not)
    5/ The colouring of the labels, the key words of the user and registers is brought into one group. It is nonsense!
    6/ It is impossible to correctly print out the sources - the print review is invalid.

    Regards,
    Igor Moleoff

Reply
  • Hi Hans!

    Thank you very much!

    There are numerous errors in versions after 9.50, namely:
    1/ Courier type won't switch. When chosen, it shifts to Courier New.
    2/ The colouring of syntax is careless.
    3/ The characters '#' '@' and others are not highlighted in Assembler control statements and in CPU instructions (for example, in MOVX A, @DPTR MOVX and A they were highligthed, and in @DPTR they are not)
    '@' and '#' are key characters of the Assembler and must be highlighted!
    4/ The operators are strangerly reflected as well (i.e., the comma in sources is highlighted and the full-stop is not)
    5/ The colouring of the labels, the key words of the user and registers is brought into one group. It is nonsense!
    6/ It is impossible to correctly print out the sources - the print review is invalid.

    Regards,
    Igor Moleoff

Children
No data