We are running a survey to help us improve the experience for all of our members. If you see the survey appear, please take the time to tell us about your experience if you can.
i get the error "main() auto segment too large" for the given program which should be run on atmet 89c51 how to fix it thanks.........
#include <reg51.h> void Delay(); char serialsend(char []);
void main () { char z; char command1[]={"AT+CGATT=1\r"}; char command2[]={"AT+CSTT= \"ufone.pinternet\"\r" }; char command3[]={"AT+CIICR\r"}; char command4[]={"AT+CIFSR\r"}; char command5[]={"AT+CIPSTART=\"TCP\"\"121.52.147.94\"800\r"}; char command6[]={"AT+CIPSEND\r"}; char command7[]={"GPRS is Activated"}; char command8[]={"26"}; TMOD = 0x20; TH1 = 0xFD; SCON = 0x50; TR1 = 1; serialsend(command1); Delay(); serialsend(command2); Delay(); serialsend(command3); for(z=0; z<3; z++) { Delay(); } serialsend(command4); Delay(); serialsend(command5); for(z=0; z<10; z++) { Delay(); } serialsend(command6); for(z=0; z<5; z++) { Delay(); } serialsend(command7); serialsend(command8);
} char serialsend(char array[]) { int i=0; while(array[i] != '\0') { SBUF = array[i]; while(TI == 0); TI = 0; i++; } }
void Delay() { unsigned char x; for(x=0; x<40; x++) { TMOD=0x10; TL1=0xFE; TH1=0xA5; TR1=1; while (TF1==0); TR1=0; TF1=0; } }
coming from you and the irrational reasoning
Your belief that you would recognize irrational reasoning is incorrect. The flaw in your deduction of this belief is the implied assumption that your own way of reasoning were rational. Too bad it's not.
and finally i did not lie..
So you make promises you don't intend to keep, and that's not a lie? Not even when you do it again directly after having been made aware of the first violation? Interesting.
i see your messages before.
Before ... what?
you like to pressure for arguments???????????
How is it pressure when I congratulate you on your decision to shut up, both times?
But I'll admit that my hope you would keep those promises really was not very strong. If you want to take that as me having set you a trap, so be it. Even then it sure wasn't a very subtle trap, by any means, so maybe you should not be quite so proud of having fallen for it.
you pressured here and i succumbed.
So, to feed you back your own words, which maybe you'll understand a bit better: you cant stop your self can you!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! So, like I observed before, you're none too good at following your own advice.
That said, I'm done with you. And unlike you, I mean it.
EOD.
irrefutable points: 1) messages whether code, data or xdata WILL be in code. 2) using "large' makes code larger and slower 3) using "large' requires he prescence of "dptr acessible" RAM
Erik