We are running a survey to help us improve the experience for all of our members. If you see the survey appear, please take the time to tell us about your experience if you can.
i get the error "main() auto segment too large" for the given program which should be run on atmet 89c51 how to fix it thanks.........
#include <reg51.h> void Delay(); char serialsend(char []);
void main () { char z; char command1[]={"AT+CGATT=1\r"}; char command2[]={"AT+CSTT= \"ufone.pinternet\"\r" }; char command3[]={"AT+CIICR\r"}; char command4[]={"AT+CIFSR\r"}; char command5[]={"AT+CIPSTART=\"TCP\"\"121.52.147.94\"800\r"}; char command6[]={"AT+CIPSEND\r"}; char command7[]={"GPRS is Activated"}; char command8[]={"26"}; TMOD = 0x20; TH1 = 0xFD; SCON = 0x50; TR1 = 1; serialsend(command1); Delay(); serialsend(command2); Delay(); serialsend(command3); for(z=0; z<3; z++) { Delay(); } serialsend(command4); Delay(); serialsend(command5); for(z=0; z<10; z++) { Delay(); } serialsend(command6); for(z=0; z<5; z++) { Delay(); } serialsend(command7); serialsend(command8);
} char serialsend(char array[]) { int i=0; while(array[i] != '\0') { SBUF = array[i]; while(TI == 0); TI = 0; i++; } }
void Delay() { unsigned char x; for(x=0; x<40; x++) { TMOD=0x10; TL1=0xFE; TH1=0xA5; TR1=1; while (TF1==0); TR1=0; TF1=0; } }
i got a grade a++ first time!!!!!!!!!!! in typing exclamation points?
and so what, folowing this (and other) forum for years it has become obvious that some "educational institutions" will graduate people that do not know which end of a resistor is up.
Anyhow, whatever the quality of the institution,the graduates are worthless the day they hit the street. NOTHING but real life experience will 'teach' the individual how to do right with a specific problem.
I have interviewed recent graduates and their lack of "real" knowledge is amazing.
Erik
PS. I recall other discussions where some individual threw education against experience and lost.
Well, I actually think some schools - or some specific teachers - can manage quite well to teach not only facts, but to only help people to learn how to search for information, and how to analyze problems and make own deductions.
Alas, it is way harder to teach people good methodology than it is to teach then specific facts. Even harder, when some students prefer to learn hard facts that they can just memorize than to try to pick up the underlying reasons for these facts and see a need for viewing problems with open eyes.
hey mates.
is there an act stupid event in the olympics.
you guys would win the gold for sure.
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
"you guys would win the gold for sure."
Yes we would. All we need to do is send you to represent us. It would be a walkover victory.
Only if you don't participate.
Behaviour like yours is usually typical of 5-year-olds. Your behaviour is about as far from the "professional" you claimed yourself to be as it is possible.
The only thing you've succeeded at here so far is to present yourself as a complete and utter imbecile. Good luck at digging your way out of that hole again, ever.
hahaha.
the fools keep appearing. and they still cant agree.
so i said
>>>>>>is there an act stupid event in the olympics.
>>>>>>you guys would win the gold for sure.
and two answers
>>>>>>All we need to do is send you to represent us.
and
>>>>>>Only if you don't participate.
priceless!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
So logic isn't your strong point - we made the same conclusion but expressed differently.
I think this is the best argument for NOT using 'large' I have seen.
>>>>>>we made the same conclusion but expressed differently.
what??????? you say i must be there and youd win. your friend says i must not be there and youd win.
those two ****** are ****** opposites.
but either way youd win the act stupid event in the olympics!!!!!
sure you and your mate will try to bluff your way out and you and your friend will claim you are all clever and im a fool. your defence just makes you look more like what you are.
hahahahahaha
My note: With you representing us, we, as a group (of let's say the worlds programmers) would win because no one can beat you at "most stupid".
Hans-Bernhard Broeker's note: The only way we (anyone but you) can win, is if we don't need to compete with you. Because no one can beat you at "most stupid".
I must assume that you are a troll. But trolls are normally way more clever.
If you are a troll, then you are a person who intentionally try to fool other people into selecting a very stupid solution.
If you aren't a troll, then god bless your poor parents.
you say i must be there and youd win.
Actually, no, that's not what Per said. What Per said is that the only way we'd be stupider than the competition was if we let you compete for our team --- not against us.
Let me remind of your own advice from earlier in this thread, regarding that there's more to understanding than reading individual words. It might have served you well to heed your own advice just this once. But of course you didn't.
>>>>>Actually, no, that's not what Per said. What Per said is that the only way we'd be stupider than the competition was if we let you compete for our team --- not against us.
are you for real??????
we agree on something. and now go back and see what you said. clue for you,,,,,,, read **** all **** of it,,,,,, carefully,,,,, you know,,,,, more than individual words!!!!!!!!!!
i **** knew **** youd try to bluff out of it.
im bored with trying to teach stones to cook chicken. i will way no more except,,,,,,
priceless.
of course i meant to say
im bored with trying to teach stones to cook chicken. i will say no more except,,,,,,
we agree on something.
No, we don't. And if you honestly thought we did, then your understanding of English, logic or both must be even worse than we already suspected --- which would be quite some achievement.
i will way no more
That's the first good idea you've had in days. If only I could believe you would actually do that.
>>>>>>No, we don't.
you let off again!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! you cant stop your self can you!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
so if you say something and i say i agree then you think we dont agree.
well matey,,,,,, your understanding of english, logic or both is definitely different to mine.
funny how you choose to say what you did and did not choose to comment upon and may be even correct the contradiction with what you and your mate wrote,,,, oh,,,,, you cant,,,, because youd have to admit you got something very wrong,,,,,,,,, my dear old english speaking chum.
the very end from me in this thread. enjoy your life of denial.
Since what you agreed to is different from what I said: yes, of course I told you you're wrong. I won't let you, of all people, be the judge of the meaning of my words.
may be even correct the contradiction with what you and your mate wrote
Given there is no such contradiction, there is nothing to correct.
,,,, oh,,,,, you cant,,,, because youd have to admit you got something very wrong
Again, no, nothing to correct.
Actually, you've made quite a show out of proving both Per and me right with every new outburst of yours. Yes, you would win that Olympic competition way ahead of anyone else who participated in this thread --- although there are some other self-proclaimed professional geniuses around here who might give you a run for you money. So the only way "we" could possibly win that medal is if you were on our team, or if you didn't participate.
the very end from me in this thread.
You promised that before. And failed to follow your own advice --- again.
Here's to hoping that you abide by your promise this time.