We are running a survey to help us improve the experience for all of our members. If you see the survey appear, please take the time to tell us about your experience if you can.
I am using P89V51RD2BN(40 Pin) IC and KEIL Compiler to generate .hex file. I have compiled a simple code to generate a square wave on pin no. 5 of P3 port(P3^5).
I m using Advantech Lab Tool-48UXP External programmer to program P89V51RD2.
When I Burn the code in Atmel 89C51 square wave is generated on pin no. 5 of P3 port(P3^5), but the same code when burn for P89V51RD2BN, it does not work.
We have included P89V51RD2.h as a header file to main source code provided on KEIL website.
P89V51RD2 processor specific STARTUP.A51 is created using KEIL µVision3 software and .hex file is created using the same software.
Please tell why such a simple code is not working in P89V51RD2??
Am I missing any steps while generating .hex file.
I asked "does your programmer have a selection for this chip and are you using it."
you never responded (well some babble about datasheets)
the programming algorithm is (fortunately) not in the datasheets any more.
if you tried to program a chip in a parallel programmer that did not have a setting for the exact chip it would not work
Erik
Hello Erik,
Thank u very much......
In Programmer we have option for selecting particular Chip.
But due to sm reason it was not working.
Thanks
Sandeep
what is 'sm'
Erik,
He's probably just borrowed the dodgy keyboard you frequently appear to use ;)
Hey Erik,
sm means some...... we have not found any reason yet but there might be problems with Universal Programmer.
Using ISP Flash Magic Tool it is working...
Thanks...
Does it?
IS it really so hard for you to type "some", so that your message will be clear and unambiguous and immediately understandable to everyone - without having to guess whether it's a typo, or some "cute" abbreviation, or whatever...?
You can make it easy for people to help you, or...
www.catb.org/.../smart-questions.html
To steal an old quote that is circling the net.
> When people say plz instead of please to me to save characters, I see no wrong is writing "no" instead of "yes" to save a character.
When people say plz instead of please to me to save characters, I see no wrong is writing "no" instead of "yes" to save a character.
On a cellphone SMS the sender saves 11 seconds by garbling the message, the receiver lose 11 seconds trying to decipher. In a public forum the poster saves 11 seconds by garbling the message and hundereds of people each lose 11 seconds trying to decipher.
u ppl nvr uz sms? dino meet.