I am looking for the lwest power Cortex M-?
I don't want to spend years searching the internet for a low-power ARM Cortex controller.
Does anybody know of one?
(And yes, it is Keil related since I'll be using Keil to program it)
Thanks,
--Cpt. Vince Foster 2nd Cannon Place Fort Marcy Park, VA
NXP recently introduced a broad line of lowest power Cortex M-series microcontrollers based on the industry leading ARM architecture. These new LPC1300 and LPC1100 microcontroller products are suitable for embedded consumer, industrial, and portable medical applications. you can register for a webinar at www.techonline.com/.../220600840 the webinar is at
Date and Time
Greenwich Mean Time Tue., Nov 03, 2009 16:00
Eastern Standard Time Tue., Nov 03, 2009 11:00 AM
Erik
about Energy Micro:
www.newelectronics.co.uk/.../32bit-micros-consumes-25-the-power-of-rivals.aspx
Yes, but they are making the claim for an unreleased processor family, when comparing them with released versions from competitors.
We regularly gets visits from chip manufacturers, informing us about upcoming chips. But they never try to compare their existing chips with competing alternatives. They always compares the chips we will be able to get prototypes of in 3-18 months and introduce in real products even further into the future with the existing offerings from competitors. And the information they supply is of course under NDA, so we can't merge the information and present comparisons to others.
It would be interesting to know the comparison for this specific family compared to competitors processors using the same manufacturing process, and if any other manufacturer will have processors using this process available within a similar time frame.
I was just thinking the same thing!
So, what would be a good application that could easily be run on a number of Cortex-M3s to get some kind of a "real-life" comarison...?
I first heard of Energy Micro's Cortex-M3 over a year ago.
I was assuming this meant that they're actually releasing parts now but, reading more carefully, it doesn't actually say that...
:-(