We are running a survey to help us improve the experience for all of our members. If you see the survey appear, please take the time to tell us about your experience if you can.
Well, my C-Textbook says
for (unsigned int i = 50;i;i--) blink(123);
CARM don't like it. What's the reason?
What's the reason?
Including variable definitions in the for statement was not part of the original C specifications. It is allowed in C++, and in newer C standards.
Also: Why are you using CARM ? It's an obsolete, discontinued product. Use the Realview compiler instead.
Yes, i tried to use Realview insted of CARM several month ago. I spend a lot of time, but i never managed it to run stable. Allways difficulties with printf entering the Abort Mode. There is a special file to be included which has to be adapted to my MCU ADuC7026. So i feeled so tired... :-)
Yes, that is in the nature of embedded systems!