This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Good substitute for obsolete Philips 89C51RD2 ???

Hello, in an ironic twist, the Philips 89C51RD2 we use for the control panels on Philips CT scanners has been discontinued due to Philips selling it's semi-conductor operations last year. So I was wondering if anyone had a good substitute they had tried ???

Thanks,
Don

Parents
  • one difference, probably the one that hit you is the 6/12 clock switching is not iodentical. The 'C' has a fuse, the 'V' has a SFR.

    are you running 6 or 12?

    I also believe the default is the opposite.

    HOWEVER, to the best of my recollection (I left these for SILabs [needed the speed]} the bits needed for the 'V' are 'don't care' in the 'C'

    Erik

Reply
  • one difference, probably the one that hit you is the 6/12 clock switching is not iodentical. The 'C' has a fuse, the 'V' has a SFR.

    are you running 6 or 12?

    I also believe the default is the opposite.

    HOWEVER, to the best of my recollection (I left these for SILabs [needed the speed]} the bits needed for the 'V' are 'don't care' in the 'C'

    Erik

Children