• State Not Answered
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 29 replies
  • Subscribers 22 subscribers
  • Views 3615 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
Related
How was your experience today?
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

error in code

jchoo235

i still have problem in the code

i think it is startup.a51 and fix but still proble when run on cpu if it does not do what i say in code

when i build it gives a message

** error C138 interupt can not recieive or return a value

but i do not interupt i do not clik the stop build button

the proj is needed and i now worry big in my pants

plz send code

Parents Reply Children
  • 0 in reply to erik malund

    I can not really believe that this can be anything but a hoax, trolling for reactions. The alternative - that it isn't a haox - would require someone in this thread to require help tying the shoes, or changing a light bulb...

    I can only recommend that the OPs threads are ignored, until we see real problems or real questions.

  • 0 in reply to ImPer Westermark

    my compiler does not understand me

    I've invented a new computer language I call DWIM (Do What I Mean). It takes whatever you type in as source code, uses some advanced new semantic inferencing technology to divine the programmer's intent, and then generates object code to do that job. Not only does this save a lot of time having to read tedious manuals on programming language syntax, implementation features, or data sheets, it also dramatically shortens the debugging cycle, as the compiler just directly generates code for the actual intent on the first pass.

    I've licensed the patents to Keil so that they can develop the compiler. You'll have to ask them about the delivery schedule, though.

  • 0 in reply to Drew Davis

    "dramatically shortens the debugging cycle, as the compiler just directly generates code for the actual intent on the first pass."

    This assumes that the programmer actually understood the problem in the first place...

    What you really want is DWIN (Do What I Need) technology - it would bypass the programmer completely, and just do a direct analysis of the problem and generates a solution from there.

    This also cuts out all that tedious requirements analysis, and trying to understand the question...

  • 0 in reply to Andy Neil

    What you really want is DWIN (Do What I Need) technology

    D'oh! DWIM-51 is obsolete even before it ships.

    You could have at least had the decency to let me IPO first.