We are running a survey to help us improve the experience for all of our members. If you see the survey appear, please take the time to tell us about your experience if you can.
Hello, I'm making use of floating math in my application and have run into a little problem with floating addition. It seems that the floating addition operation looses data at some point. I setup the following test program:
#include <intrins.h> void main(void) { float t, v; unsigned int i; while(1) { // this block uses multiplication for(i=1; i<1000; i++) { t = 5964.1 * i; v = t/i; if(v != 5964.1) _nop_(); } t = 0; // this block will continuously add 5964.1 for(i=1; i<1000; i++) { t += 5964.1; v = t/i; if(v != 5964.1) _nop_(); } } }
However, why does this error accumulation exist? This is similar to the problem of buying 3 items for $1.00. If I go to the store and I buy 6 items, the price is $2.00. This is similar to your multiplication code. If I go to the store and I buy 1 item, the price is $0.33. If I go to the store later and buy 1 item, the price is $0.33. If I go to the store a third time and buy 1 item, the price is $0.33. Buying the items individually, I've only paid $0.99 instead of $1.00. This is equivalent to your addition code. The reason for the difference is that we can't represent 1/3 of a cent using the coins that we have. Now, with floating-point math, we have a 23-bit base-2 mantissa. That gives us about 7 decimal digits of precision. Don't forget that 5964.1 is not stored in base-10. It's stored in base-2 and normalized and is expanded/contracted with an exponent (power of 2) as Drew pointed out. The reason, that iterative adding doesn't equate to instantaneous multiplication is because at some point in the additions, the result exceeds the precision of the storage format (IEEE-754) and digits from the end (binary digits, that is) are lost. The same as with the 1/3 of a penny. That's why with floating-point math, you must use comparisons that account for TLAR (that looks about right). Jon
Ahh, Good Example. Thanks Jon and Drew. Phil
I only wish to thank to Drew Davis and Jon Ward for the superb reply. I know this rule of the thumb, for a long time: "Never compare floats without a precision." But i'd never seen such a good explanation and example!! PS: Thank you Jon, now i know haw to save 0.01 $ in the shop... :)
Thank you Jon, now i know haw to save 0.01 $ in the shop... :) Ahhh. But be careful. Some cash register systems can be programmed to always round-up and in such a case you would pay $0.34 for each item ($1.02 for 3). :-) Jon
Yes,I'v understood last explaination. but, in my program, if I excute a float math. 4.6-4, the result will be 0.5999999. this is terrible for a user display. User will say"that's wrong". The question is how to resolve it, can I patch it?
Round the results up before displaying them. Stefan
You have two options for patching this: 1) change the program. Make it present results cut down to a reasonable number of digits. Avoid showing the noise that's sitting in (at least) the last digit of any floating point result. 2) change the user. Educate them about floating point comparison. Teach them the old dogma: In computing, 10.0 times 0.1 is hardly ever 1.0
Avoid showing the noise that's sitting in (at least) the last digit of any floating point result. what about noise between 99999 and 100000? In computing, 10.0 times 0.1 is hardly ever 1.0 BS, it ALWAYS is if you do not use the much overused floating point. Erik
"The question is how to resolve it" Do you really need to use floating point? As has already been discussed, this will always result in such problems. Could you use fixed-point instead?
what about noise between 99999 and 100000? If you write it in an appropriate way for floating point numbers, that'll be 9.9999e4 and 1.00000e5. And for a 4-byte float, that's excessive displayed precision, in other words, you're showing noise. Reduce the format to %.3g and you'll get 1.000e5 in both cases. BS, it ALWAYS is if you do not use the much overused floating point But if you see a manifest constant written 0.1, that practically always is floating point. I don't think I've seen any programming language in which "10.0 * 0.1" would be evaluated in some fixed point number format. Have you? Anyway: it's called a dogma not because it's always actually true, but because by remembering it, you'll learn something useful.
But if you see a manifest constant written 0.1, that practically always is floating point. I don't think I've seen any programming language in which "10.0 * 0.1" would be evaluated in some fixed point number format. Have you? I have programmed for more years than most and never had to use floating point. Floating point is the lazy mans way to handle fractions. Erik
Could you use fixed-point instead? That's what I ALWAYS do in systems where accuracy is important. The following is probably obvious but I'll point it out anyway. An int can hold any of the following value ranges EASILY:
-32768 to 32767 -3276.8 to 3276.7 (*10) -327.68 to 327.67 (*100) -32.768 to 32.767 (*1000) -3.2768 to 3.2767 (*10000)
"Floating point is the lazy mans way to handle fractions" That what I want to learn!!!Thanks a lot! I'm really a lazy man.