• State Not Answered
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 6 replies
  • Subscribers 22 subscribers
  • Views 1532 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
Related
How was your experience today?
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

MDK 5 compatibility

a b

I have been reading MDK5 documentation and testing different projects for several days.
I got an impression that better stay with MDK4 if you have ongoing projects developed under MDK4, which is my case. Otherwise it will be a nightmare.

Parents
  • 0 in reply to Reinhard Keil

    Thanks for your replay

    Yes, I did. It will make most of the UV4 projects going.
    But for maintaining the existing projects in production, I just don't have the confidence that it won't cause me any issues down the road.
    I am using RTOS and RL-TCPnet in most of my product.

    I didn't have too much of concern in those UV4 MDK version upgrades.

    I think I am not the only one having this impression about MDK5 after playing with MDK5 on a separate computer for almost a week now, or am I? LoL

    Thanks

    Paul

Reply
  • 0 in reply to Reinhard Keil

    Thanks for your replay

    Yes, I did. It will make most of the UV4 projects going.
    But for maintaining the existing projects in production, I just don't have the confidence that it won't cause me any issues down the road.
    I am using RTOS and RL-TCPnet in most of my product.

    I didn't have too much of concern in those UV4 MDK version upgrades.

    I think I am not the only one having this impression about MDK5 after playing with MDK5 on a separate computer for almost a week now, or am I? LoL

    Thanks

    Paul

Children
No data